Feeds

Pirate Bay prosecutor argues for one year prison terms

BitTorrent coat-holders should do bird

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The chief prosecutor in The Pirate Bay trial wants to see each of the four defendants spend a year in prison for running the BitTorrent tracker website.

Håkan Roswall argued that the sentences should be handed to the four men accused in the case during a closing statement he made in the Stockholm district court this morning, according to Swedish online news site The Local.

He claimed that The Pirate Bay brought in around 10m kronor ($1.1m) a year, which to him proved that it was much more than simply a “hobby site” as has been argued by its cofounders’ defence lawyers during the case.

Roswall compared Peter Sunde, Carl Lundström, Frederik Neij and Gottfrid Svartholm Warg’s involvement in The Pirate Bay’s operations with complicity in crimes like assault under Swedish law.

“The person who is holding a person’s coat while they assault someone else is complicit in the crime,” he told the court.

Roswall dismissed arguments by the defence that file sharers could get their hands on torrent files using other torrent trackers as “a technical objection”.

Prosecutors estimated in the indictment, which concerns 33 works that include albums, movies and computer games that The Pirate Bay reeled in 1.2m kronor per year from its operations.

“But my estimate is extremely low,” added Roswall. “The [net] profits are much greater than that.” He cited new calculations showing that the file sharing site brings in annual income of 10m kronor, after expenses had been deducted.

“And therefore The Pirate Bay isn’t some sort of charity operation. It’s a business,” he said.

Warg told the TT news agency during a break in this morning’s proceedings that he was “surprised” that the prosecutor was only demanding a sentence of one year for each defendant.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry's (IFPI) Peter Danowsky took to the stand after Roswall and emphasised that file sharing itself wasn't on trial in Stockholm.

“The case is about whether the activities carried out by The Pirate Bay violated applicable laws and what the legal consequences should be,” he said.

Danowsky also rejected the defendants' argument that people could download copyrighted material from other websites or search for torrent files using Google.

“To say that ‘so many others also commit the same crime and therefore we shouldn’t be convicted’ doesn’t hold, and that’s something to which courts never give any consideration,” he said. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
4chan outraged by Emma Watson nudie photo leak SCAM
In the immortal words of Shaggy, it wasn't me us ... amirite?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.