Ofcom wants mobile TV spectrum pulled
TV without frontiers - or radio frequencies
Aspiring mobile TV provider ICO Global Communications has reacted angrily to the UK regulator's decision to pull its spectrum, leaving it without the frequencies it needs to keep talking.
ICO is a Cayman-Island-based company with aspirations of running a constellation of ten satellites for mobile satellite TV services. The first bird went up in 2001, and in 2004 Ofcom agreed to ask the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) to reserve some 2GHZ spectrum for ICO, but since then no satellites have been launched and no service has been forthcoming, prompting Ofcom to ask the ITU to release the spectrum.
The move will delight Solaris, Inmarsat Ventures and TerreStar Europe, who are all competing for the 2GHz-mobile-satellite-TV beauty contest that the EU is planning. That contest should establish who gets to offer DVB-SH to EU residents who not only want to be able to watch digital TV on the move, but want to able to do so far away from fixed infrastructure.
Which goes some way to explaining ICO's anger at the move. In a statement sent to El Reg, the company points out that the bird they launched in 2001 is operating fine, and that it has "spent more than a decade and billions of dollars constructing an international satellite system" before attributing the delays to being embroiled in "a significant legal action against the Boeing companies regarding the fraudulent activity, breach of contract and tortuous interference" in which it recently prevailed.
Ofcom's plans to write to the ITU on March 17, but the ICO statement makes it clear the company is prepared to lobby the ITU against the decision, and resort to litigation if necessary.
DVB-SH broadcasts digital television to mobile terminals including phones direct from satellites, but also uses local relays in urban areas - these receive the satellite broadcast and retransmit at a lower frequency providing in-building coverage as well as amongst tower blocks where line-of-sight is hard to obtain. Broadcasters therefore need birds in the air, and ground stations too, as well as expensive low-frequency spectrum for retransmitting.
The technology recently had the opportunity to prove itself during trials in Turin, which were hailed a success by the companies taking part and mean that we now have the technology to deliver the service, which, unfortunately, no one seems to want or be able to afford. Just because we can bounce Filthy Rich: Cattle Drive off the sky, and catch it on a mobile phone even when wandering the hinterlands of Europe, there's really no reason why we should feel compelled to do so. ®
Ibis redibis non morieris in bello
As oracle, the operators predict markets worse than the Met. Office predicts weather. How long did they block inter-network SMS because they thought there was no money there?
Do people care about TV resolution? If so, why watch on a phone? If not, what's the point of HDTV?
Do people care about monitor resolution? If so, how can web pages compete on a phone? If not, why was WAP so successful (ha!)
Nobody wants mobile TV?
Are you crazy? Millions upon millions who bought WAP-enabled phones and routinely engage in video calls are clamouring for it! You speak as though TV audiences overall are in decline and mobile TV is merely an expensive way to deliver more of what people already have more than enough of in a very inconvenient format.
Do the kids remember?
British Satellite Broadcasting- the UK government's official pick for satellite TV services in Britain? The first thing they did, the very first thing, was build themselves an impressive new office building. Then they started looking at innovative new technology for reception dishes, which in the end didn't work very well, and launched their own satellites. By the time they had a service up, SKY had stolen all their customers, operating out of a bunch of prefabs in an industrial estate and using standard satellite dishes and rented transponders on European owned satellites already in operation.
After they had comprehensibly failed, BSB was bought up by SKY, heaven knows why (maybe to get the UK government certificate). It didn't cost much anyway. SKY has now adopted the initials.