Feeds

Nortel to cut 3,200 workers

Without severance

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Nortel Networks plans to lay off 3,200 workers worldwide, about a tenth of the total workforce. The latest round of reductions follow 1,800 job cuts the company announced in December.

The Toronto-based telecom equipment maker, which filed for bankruptcy protection last month, said today it will also drop employee bonuses for 2008 and end stock-based compensation. Nortel expects the layoffs to be made over the next several months.

"Tough decisions are being made to restructure the company and work towards a successful emergence from creditor protection, Nortel CEO Mike Zafirovski said in a statement.

A Nortel spokesman confirmed to us that none of the employees being laid off in North America will receive severance pay.

"Unfortunately, as we announced with our bankrupcy filing in January, we will not be able to pay severance," he said. "Despite every effort, we do not have the financial flexibility to make any changes to our severance policies under court protection. This makes today's decision to make layoffs even more difficult for everyone at Nortel."

Nortel filed for Chapter 11 protection last month after losing more than $4bn in 2008 due to telcos cutting back spending or switching to cheaper suppliers. The company also watched its shares plummet from $15 at the start of 2008 to just $0.10 at the close of NASDAQ yesterday.

The company also hasn't ruled out making more job cuts in the near future.

Nortel recently got an extension of its bankruptcy protection until May 1 to help develop a better turnaround plan. In addition to the new round of layoffs, Nortel will not pay bonuses for 2008 authorized by the company's annual incentive plan. The company said it will issue some grants in 2009, only based on quarterly rather than annual award payouts.

Zafirovski called the layoffs "difficult," but said that significant changes are needed to regain Nortel's financial footing. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.