Feeds

Feds forge gold standard for cybersecurity

Modest revolution

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

A consortium of US federal agencies have drawn up a list of critical security controls they hope will serve as a gold standard for cybersecurity.

The Consensus Audit Guidelines (CAG) list is part of larger plans to apply the CSIS Commission report on cybersecurity as a blueprint for making information security systems more secure. A public consultation on the scheme, launched on Monday, is due to run through 23 March. After that point federal security agencies will road-test the scheme.

Information security specialists at federal agencies pooled their knowledge on current attack techniques and countermeasures to draw up a list of 20 key actions, termed security controls, that organisations need to take to defend against assault. The first 15 controls on the draft list lend themselves to automation, while the remaining five have more to do with broader security policy and personnel issues.

Although these controls were drawn up by federal agencies they might be applied across diverse industry sectors from retailing, to banks, defense contractors and government agencies.

Each of the 20 controls was matched against specific threats and benchmarked in what might be considered a closed alpha test that its developers want to open up for wider scrutiny. It's hoped the controls, once fully vetted, will become the "standard baseline for measuring computer security". Most of the controls are not prescriptive and talk in broad terms about the need to audit equipment, use up to date ant-virus defences, firewalls and the like.

The list resembles the guideline drawn up by the credit card industry for adherence to the PCI DSS, at least at first sight. Experts involved in the scheme argue that CAG is far more ambitious.

"I do not know of anything going on in security that will have the impact this one can have," Alan Paller, director of research at the SANS Institute told El Reg. "It's a complete revolution in federal cybersecurity, and business security as well."

"In the past cybersecurity was driven by people who had no clue of how the attacks are carried out. They created an illusion of security. The CAG will turn that illusion to reality".

"If the nation (and the rest of the developed world) cannot make the CAG work we will continue to fall further behind the attackers at an accelerating rate," he added.

The CAG project is led by John Gilligan, former US AirForce chief information officer and began last year in response to data losses in the US defense industry. Organisations involved include the National Security Agency, the US Department of Homeland Security, US-CERT, the US Department of Defense, the US Department of Energy Los Alamos National Lab and three other National Labs, among others.

The Mitre Corporation, which runs the CVSS vulnerability scoring system, the SANS Institute and commercial penetration testing firms are also involved.

Proposed controls not already on the list need to be provably effective in either blocking or mitigating against known attacks.

The resulting guidelines will be evaluated against other security stands such as ISO 2700x, HIPAA (health care regulations), PCI, and SOX (Sarbannes-Oxley) to see whether actions included in these standards are better than approaches suggested in draft CAG guidelines. If so, they will be taken on board, as appropriate.

Dan Galik, Chief Information Security Officer, US Department of Health and Human Services, welcomed the proposals as an improvement on existing federal security regimes.

"I think it will go a long way towards recalibrating the Federal cyber security efforts away from being what many have described as a report card driven paper-work exercise, to instead being now properly focused on meaningful efforts to improve the real security posture of our operational systems," he said. ®

Critical security controls

  1. Hardware audit.
  2. Inventory of authorized and unauthorized Software.
  3. Secure configurations for computers and servers
  4. Secure configurations of network kits such as firewalls and routers.
  5. Boundary defense
  6. Maintenance of audit logs
  7. Application software security
  8. Application of administrative privileges
  9. Access controls based on need to know
  10. Continuous vulnerability testing and remediation
  11. Dormant account monitoring and control
  12. Anti-malware defenses
  13. Limitation and control of ports, protocols and services
  14. Wireless device control
  15. Data leak protection
  16. Secure network engineering
  17. Red team exercises
  18. Incident response capability
  19. Data recovery
  20. Security Skills Assessment and Training

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests
Day 4: 'News'-papers STILL rammed with Clooney nuptials
Shellshock: 'Larger scale attack' on its way, warn securo-bods
Not just web servers under threat - though TENS of THOUSANDS have been hit
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
PEAK IPV4? Global IPv6 traffic is growing, DDoS dying, says Akamai
First time the cache network has seen drop in use of 32-bit-wide IP addresses
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.