Feeds

Feuding iPhone fart-makers raise legal stink

This whole court is out of odor!

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

The developer behind the iPhone's top digital fart generator wants the American legal system to declare that using the phrase "pull my finger" does not run afoul of a rival's trademark.

Infomedia, maker the immensely popular iFart Mobile app, is taking Pull My Finger developer Air-O-Matic to Colorado court seeking a declaratory judgment and additional "relief."

It could very well result in the most important US fart-related judgment since the case of Smelt it V. Dealt it.

Infomedia alleges that Air-O-Matic has repeatedly sent it complaints over its use of the common flatulence-related expression, "pull my finger," in iFart's marketing materials. The app developer claims it's taking preemptive legal action to avoid being subject to liability.

The filing also includes letters allegedly from Air-O-Matic counsel Karen Burr complaining that iFart lead developer Joel Comm posted negative reviews for competing fart-producing app on iTunes in addition to writing glowing "testimonials" for his own software. It further claims Burr spammed Pull My Finger customers on Twitter with ads for iFart.

Comm responds on his personal blog that he has the right to state his opinion and that he simply used Twitter to "engage in conversation" with users of competing fart apps.

(On Joel Comm's blog, the words "great pride," "true entertainment machine," and "iFart" collide in a sentence without any apparent irony.)

Comms claims in his blog that Air-O-Matic had first contacted Apple insisting that iFart be removed from the iTunes store because of "unfair business practices." Apple told the two developers to settle the issue on their own.

When Infomedia's legal counsel then contacted Air-O-Matic, the rival firm declined talks and demanded $50,000 in alleged damages, according to correspondences filed by InfoMedia.

"Pull My Finger fell precipitously from being the #1 iPhone application as a direct result of InfoMedia's systematic efforts to profit from the Pull My Finger name and leverage the buzz around it," a letter allegedly from Air-O-Matic's counsel to Infomedia states. "InfoMedia's efforts have been directing at merging Pull My Finger and iFart in the consumers' minds, so that searches for Pull My Finger pull up the iFart application.

A copy of InfoMedia's complaint can be found here.

The whole odious situation is really a shame. Ask any cashier – money and farts shouldn't mix. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.