Feeds

Nokia chops and changes for cost-efficiency

Site closures, 'temporary lay-offs'

Boost IT visibility and business value

Nokia will close its Jyväskylä product-development site by the end of 2009, and scale back its Salo site - a shame for those who got relocated there in the last round of cuts.

Jyväskylä employs 320 people, all of whom will be affected by the closure, while the Salo site - to which staff laid off from Turku were relocated in November - will lose more than 500 of the 2,500 employees though a process of "temporary lay-offs" that will enable Nokia to scale back production at the site.

Those 500 staff won't lose their jobs, just be put out to pasture on a rotational basis that will include all staff at the site, in a process that Nokia tells us is "common practice" in Finland.

The Finnish giant is spinning this as "increased efficiency", but admits that it isn't shifting as many handsets as it used to. This is all part of a plan to spend more time developing fewer products in the future - which is why it can cut so many research and development people as well as marketing bods. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.