Intel releases eight-headed* beast
* - misbehaving heads may be severed
ISSCC Intel offered only a few new details about its latest processor offerings at the International Solid-State Circuit Conference (ISSCC) today, even though it essentially had the stage to itself.
AMD, IBM, and Sun chose to sit out the Microprocessor Technologies session, forcing the hundreds of engineers hungry for CPU info to dine only on the few crumbs doled out by Intel.
That said, the major announcement was a big one - but of no surprise to chip watchers: the eight-core enterprise-level Nehalem-EX Xeon processor. With its 2.3 billion transistors, this new 45nm chip has the largest number of functional units of any commercial processor ever released, according to Intel's Stephan Rusu.
Although Rusu provided no product-ID numbers - or clock rates or ship dates - the new Xeon is almost certain to be in the company's 74xx line of enterprise-server chips, unless Intel defines it as the beginning of a new line, which is unlikely.
The processor's eight cores will each employ the company's implementation of simultaneous multithreading (SMT) technology to support two simultaneous threads per core. Managing SMT extracts a performance penalty, but it should be less than 10 per cent, according to Intel's Rajesh Kumar.
In addition to its eight cores, the Nehalem-EX also has eight cache slices combined into one L3 cache of up to 24MB, shared by all eight cores as allocated by a central hub router.
This large number of cores and caches led Intel to introduce a new technology called Core and Cache Recovery. This post-manufacturing, pre-sale technique permanently shuts down misbehaving cores and caches before a Nehalem-EX leaves the factory.
According to Rusu, the reason for Core and Cache Recovery is simple: if one part of the complex chip is disabled, the entire chip doesn't have to be thrown out. Instead, it will simply be sold as a core-disabled and/or cache-disabled SKU at a lower price.
Importantly, if a core or cache is disabled, it will be locked down so that it won't contribute to current leakage. A core shutdown will result in an 83 per cent leakage-power savings, while a cache shutdown's savings would be in the 35 percent range.
Rusu went to pains to assure attendees, however, that the reason the leakage savings of a cache shutdown would be less on a percentage basis was because a fully operational cache has so little leakage to begin with - "1000 times" less than the company's previous cache-transistor design, he explained.
Other news about the Nehalem-EX was, well, not really news. Memory controllers, for example, will be on-chip - an inclusion that Kumar referred to as "relatively trivial," possibly because AMD did it first. The non-trivial part of placing the memory on-chip, according to Kumar, was "how to do it cheaply." He assured his audience that Intel had found a way to do just that.
Like other Nehalem-class processors, this eight-core beast will use Intel's unfortunately named Turbo Mode to borrow power from idle cores and use it to boost the clock speed of active ones. Also, it will use the 20-lane-each-way, point-to-point QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) used in other Nehalem chips to communicate among CPUs and I/O controllers at 6.4Gt/s (gigatransfers per second), achieving a throughput of up to 25.6GB/s for each of the Nehalem-EX's four QPI ports.
QPI is smart enough to shut itself down when a socket contains a CPU that's either idle or absent - a useful, power-saving trait, seeing as how Rusu showed socket set-ups with up to eight CPUs.
Speaking of sockets, the Nehalem-EX's package is a 14-layer organic substrate and has a hefty 1,567 lands with a 40mm pitch. And although Rusu refused to give final die-size information, he did say that one advantage of the Nehalem-EX's wide-open spaces will be that "a large die with spread-out cores is relatively easy to cool."
And speaking of cooling, the Nehalem-EX will have nine thermal sensors, one for each of the cores and one in the uncore, which is chipspeak for elements that are not part of an actual processing core. In the Nehalem architecture, the uncore includes that hefty L3 cache, the memory controllers, QPI ports, and one-per-core phase-locked loop (PLL) circuitry, which keeps everything in step.
In keeping with the "leaner and greener" theme to be found in sessions throughout the conference, Rusu proudly pointed out that the Nehalem-EX is "100 percent lead and 100 per cent halogen free."
Prices for the Nehalem-Ex were not mentioned, but they'll certainly be nowhere near "100 per cent free." ®
COMMENTS
here is your opportunity to post one.....with dates
post it here...give a link....I would hope Sun has the latest roadmap on their website...I hope it has dates though....last one I saw had the dates deleted.....then Fujitsu's does not even have rock on it
http://www.fujitsu.com/img/SPARCE/technology/protection/roadmap01.gif
All we know is ponytail "thinks it's later this year"
you can easily find intel roadmaps
Perhaps the Reg should post an article pointing to the real roadmap
Fake Roadmaps, incorrect proclamations, bad assumptions and a complete lack of fact or vendor information.
Sounds like someone is trying to hide some of their own problems.
If Rock is dead, nobody has told Jonathan, John F, or anyone else that matters at Sun... (See recent articles already cited)
Go on, El Reg - Post an article pointing to the real SPARC roadmap. I dare you.
And - see if you can find out when Intel actually plans to release Nehalem in anything other than 2 socket variants. I read it's not till 2010, and if past experiences with large, scalable NUMA systems is anything to go by, don't be surprised if it's even later than that. Think back to the last time they tried...
maybe a Sun employee who was recently RIF'd
that would make the most sense
Re: Another roadmap where Rock is missing
A scared competitor putting out an obviously faked roadmap? I still can't tell which vendor, and probably not really a vendor but an overzealous employee, is spreading this around... It doesn't even look real. Notice the wrong fonts?
My guess would be IBM as POWER seems to have lost a bit of the excitement that it carried in the past. Of course it could be HP as they are waiting on a woefully disappointing Itanic update. But Itanic is getting lot's of press right now and the HP faithful wouldn't feel the need to put out obviously false data. That is, except for Matt B, as he always finds the need to put out obviously false data.
@Chris
"This isn't supposed to be an academic journal, you know!"
Well, duh. But there is a time and a place for everything.
"Perhaps in your view the title should have been something as exciting as "Intel releases eight-core cpu"."
In THIS particular case, it would make more sense, yes.
"Well, it's accurate, but some folks also like a little humour in their lives,"
I agree. That's what Odds & Sods and Public Sector (and to a lessor degree, Security) are for.
"and I would be fairly confident of guessing that most people payed very little attention to this gross misuse of this word 'head'."
Most people aren't qualified to run computers, either. I suspect that the article in question would have received a lot more page hits from professionals with a non-frivolous subject line. Speaking only for myself, I nearly missed it ... and it's a subject I'm interested in.
"Perhaps you'll understand if I put it this way - (I presume you spend a lot of time coding!):"
Actually, at this time of year I spend a lot of time getting ready for mares to foal and/or doing all the little groundwork things that help prepare the babies for when it comes time for more formal training. In general, I don't code anymore. I hire someone to do it for me. My time is more useful elsewhere.
"When compiling a sentence, if either the HUMOUR or JOURNALISTIC_LICENSE symbols are defined, then many more words are compiled with overloaded constructors, taking a variety of parameters to denote a variety of meanings!!"
Whatever. As I said, English is a precise language when used properly.
