Feeds

Intel to spend $7bn to upgrade US factories

Setting an investment example for Washington

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Intel's president and chief executive officer, Paul Otellini, was at the Economic Club in Washington DC this morning as the Senate, the House, and the White House are arguing about what kinds of investments to make in the US economy.

Otellini announced that despite Intel's economic woes as the PC and server businesses slow, it would be spending $7bn over the next two years to upgrade its chip factories in the States. If Intel can do it, Uncle Sam can.

Intel's announcement was also a reason to do a little flag-waving, as President Obama is on a mission to create or preserve 4m American jobs with an economic stimulus package bill he had hoped to sign into law before the upcoming President's Day holiday.

"We're investing in America to keep Intel and our nation at the forefront of innovation," Otellini explained in a statement announcing Intel's capital investment plans for its factories. "These manufacturing facilities will produce the most advanced computing technology in the world. The capabilities of our 32nm factories are truly extraordinary, and the chips they produce will become the basic building blocks of the digital world, generating economic returns far beyond our industry."

Intel said that it would be spending that dough in its factories in Oregon, Arizona, and New Mexico, which currently have 7,000 "high-wage, high-skill" jobs and which are a key part of Intel's 45,000 workforce based in the United States. Of course, Intel announced only two weeks ago that it was closing down five plants worldwide and laying off between 5,000 and 6,000 employees, including wafer fabrication facilities in Oregon and California as well as chip assembly plants in Malaysia and the Philippines. Intel has not said how many US jobs are in that round of layoffs.

The company has also announced it will shut down its Shanghai chip plant, which employs 2,000 people, and move those jobs to a cheaper industrial zone in China.

To help cut costs in the wake of its $8.2bn in sales in the fourth quarter, where sales were down 19 per cent but net income plummeted by 90 per cent to of $234m, Intel has been cutting spending and trying to reduce its 84,000 global workforce. Yesterday, Intel announced that it was canceling its IDF Taipei conference and cutting back its IDF Beijing conference to a single day and focusing only on local vendors. While IDF is not as costly as other things that Intel does, with companies cutting travel budgets and business weak, those who might have attended these events have their own issues to wrestle with at this point, so attendance is probably going to be low anyway.

In any event, Otellini's statement from Washington was keen to remind everyone - and particularly the Congress members from Oregon, Arizona, New Mexico, and California - that Intel is one of the big American companies that exports a lot of products and creates US jobs. Intel says that 75 per cent of its sales are to overseas customers, while 75 per cent of its semiconductor manufacturing capacity and about 75 per cent of its research and development spending is done in America.

While this is a good story, and better than it might otherwise be from an American perspective, what it really shows is that Intel is a manufacturer that, for now, can make a buck by making chips in the US, while the US-based computer companies that use Intel's products have long since had to outsource and offshore manufacturing just to stay in business.

In related news, Intel said that the ramp on its 32 nanometer chip making processes was proceeding ahead of schedule, and that the "Westmere" 32 nanometer rev on the "Nehalem" desktop and laptop chips that has graphics processing integrated into the chip complex. "Outstanding 32nm manufacturing and product health are enabling Intel to accelerate the Westmere production ramp beginning in 2009. Additional 32nm products will follow in 2010," Intel said in the statement.

Intel will be demonstrating the first fully functional Westmere part later today at an event in San Francisco. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
One step closer to ROBOT BUTLERS: Dyson flashes vid of VACUUM SUCKER bot
Latest cleaner available for world+dog in September
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.