The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

US considers audible warnings for cameraphones

'Attention! Possible voyeur taking picture!'

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Proposed US legislation could, if adopted, force manufacturers to produce cameraphones that issue audible warnings each time you snap anything from friends and family to your neighbour’s bloomers on the washing line.

The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act – put forward earlier this month by New York Republican Peter King - is designed to protect people from “a new brand of criminal” that takes “photographs under children's skirts” and in female changing rooms.

The bill – which has been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce – states that “any mobile phone containing a digital camera... shall sound a tone or other sound audible within a reasonable radius of the phone whenever a photograph is taken”.

It also states that users mustn’t be able to disable the tone. But the law would only apply to cameraphones, so snappers equipped with digital SLRs or compact cameras would still be free to click away under cover.

It’s worth noting that the Camera Phone Predator Alert Act was first introduced way back in September 2007. And, according to a 2008 report on King’s website, a young girl “fighting back against these [cameraphone] predators” came up with the bill’s principal points.

However, it all seems rather daft to us. Imagine snapping a picture of your girlfriend in a park, with every nearby mugger alerted by your iPhone warning: “Attention! Cameraphone activated!” ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Latest Comments

Pretty stupid really.

If people are willing to ignore existing laws, what the heck makes them think they'll abide by this one?

And if I was a dirty pervert, a phone camera is the last thing I'd pick to take my ill-gotten images. There'es tonnes better choices from tiny wireless spy cameras to proper point and shoot cameras that are as small as a phone anyway (but higher quality images).

0
0

I see a problem with this

Why wouldn't the perv just use a small digital camera without audio rather than a cell phone with?

0
0

Great!

Lets ban something too, while we're at it.

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?
Review: Belkin Thunderbolt Express Dock
Missing Mac ports reunited, for a price
 breaking news
Australian 'Apple tax' repealed for MacBook Air
But the new MacPro is priced at a premium