Intel chairman Craig Barrett retires
Timing is everything
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Intel had announced that its chairman, Craig Barrett, will retire at the company's annual stockholders' meeting this May.
No reason was given for the retirement. The Reg has contacted Intel for clarification, but has not immediately received a response. We'll update you when we do.
Barrett's announcement comes just two days after Intel revealed that it would close five plants in a restructuring move that would affect between 5,000 and 6,000 employees worldwide.
Barrett, who at 69 is three years from Intel's mandatory retirement age, joined the company in 1974. Among his many positions during his 35-year tenure, he served as CEO from 1998 through 2005.
In a statement, Barrett said that he had "every confidence that Intel will continue [its technology] leadership under the direction of [president and CEO] Paul Otellini and his management team."
Otellini said that Barrett's "legacy spans the creation of the best semiconductor manufacturing machine in the world, leading Intel for seven years as we emerged into a global powerhouse."
Intel's board of directors has elected independent director Jane Shaw to take the reins in May as the company's non-executive chairman.
Shaw's challenges are readily apparent to industry watchers, as Intel and the rest of the semiconductor industry struggle to wend their way through a Meltdown so severe that Rick Tsai, CEO of the giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, predicted today that the global semiconductor market may shrink by 30 percent in 2009.
Whatever Barrett's reasons are for retiring, you can't fault his timing. ®
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
COMMENTS
Poor spin control
saying he was taking voluntary redundancy (although maybe staying quiet about the associated big pile o'wonga) would at least have the appearance of a solid determination to cut costs throughout the business.
Old codger retires
He's 69. It's not as if he's got many opportunities ahead of him to make career highlights. If it looks like a shitty year or two coming up then might as well pull out of corporate America and go enjoy life. Why work through a shitty time just to retire at the end?
If I had my yacht mooring and lifetime country club membership paid up, I'd quit to (and I'm not 50 yet) .
Privilege
How many regular employees do you think would have been carried this long?

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring