Feeds

Citrix and Intel go to bare metal to virtualize PCs

Giving VPro a Type 1 personality

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Intel and hypervisor provider Citrix Systems are announcing a joint collaboration that will see a bare-metal hypervisor based on the commercial variant of the Xen hypervisor delivered later this year.

While there are a number of different ways that you can use hypervisors to virtualize your x86 or x64 desktop or laptop computer these days, they all employ what is called a type 2 hypervisor instead of the more robust and secure type 1, or bare metal, hypervisor.

There are lots of ways to give end users a virtual PC, but running a bare-metal hypervisor and its operating systems locally on the machine is the way that companies are probably going to be most comfortable doing it. VMware's Workstation (and its Fusion variant for the Mac), Microsoft's Virtual PC, Parallels' Desktop and Workstation, and Sun's VirtualBox (from the Innotek acquisition), and a number of others all work by loading a hypervisor on top of an operating system and then allowing multiple operating systems to pile into virtual machines running atop the hypervisor.

The underlying operating system - usually Windows, Linux or Mac OS on x64 PCs - provides system services to the VMs, and is a single point of failure and a potential security risk for the virtualized environments. Moreover, operating systems running inside type 2 hypervisors are often clunky and slow.

For security and isolation between VMs, which would allow people to mix personal life and business applications on the same physical machine - something we all do, so don't lie - what you really need is a type 1 hypervisor running on the desktop or laptop machines. So Citrix is teaming up with Intel, which supplies most of the chips used in desktops and laptops, to create a variant of the XenServer hypervisor aimed at PCs.

Under the agreement announced today, the two companies are cooking up a PC hypervisor that will be optimized for Intel's VPro business PC designs and the latest generations of Core 2 and Centrino 2 laptops, which all have the hardware and BIOS features in place to support a hypervisor being buried in their electronics. Significantly, the way Citrix and Intel are doing this, desktops shipped over the past two years and laptops from the last year or so will be able to make use of the Xen desktop hypervisor, not just new machines that start shipping sometime in the second half of the year when this project gets out product.

While Citrix was fired up to be partnering with Intel, the two companies were a little short on the specifics of the agreement and exactly how the hypervisor would be deployed in desktops and laptops. The PC hypervisor will, of course, exploit the VT hardware features in Intel's x64 chips to goose the performance of the Xen hypervisor. Intel expects that its OEM partners will be able to easily pick up this technology and run with it, so presumably Xen will be stored on an internal flash drive inside a machine, much as it is with modern servers using the embedded versions of hypervisors from VMware and Citrix.

The two companies are particularly interested in letting businesses know that the bare-metal hypervisor they are building will allow for encryption of the data that represents an entire machine - a virtual machine is just a monster file on a disk - and that the Trusted Platform Module electronics on VPro motherboards and the related TXT feature that makes use of it will be used by the hypervisor to do this encryption and to otherwise secure the VMs.

Ian Pratt, Xen project founder and the vice president of advanced product for Citrix' Virtualization and Management Division, says that the agreement between Intel and Citrix is not exclusive, and that there are no specific hooks between the VPro electronics and the modified version of the hypervisor. This means you can expect a similar announcement between Intel and VMware soon, and probably one between Intel and Microsoft in the not-too-distant future.

The future Xen PC hypervisor being developed is distinct from XenDesktop, which is the Citrix product for storing virtualized PC servers back in the data center and streaming them down to thin clients or regular PCs. Intel and Citrix expect to be streaming data between PCs and laptops and corporate data centers, just as with XenDesktop, but this time software will be running locally on the PCs instead of back on the servers. That means applications can make use of local hardware, such as USB devices and graphics cards. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Lenovo to finish $2.1bn IBM x86 server gobble in October
A lighter snack than expected – but what's a few $100m between friends, eh?
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.