Feeds

Storage vendor Overland on the ropes

Deepening recession forces staff and pay cuts

Boost IT visibility and business value

Savaged by the deepening recession, beleaguered NAS, disk and tape protection vendor Overland Storage has fired 53 people and instituted a ten per cent pay cut for all remaining salaried staff.

Having laid off 54 people in April 2008, loss-making Overland was in the midst of a recovery from earlier misfortunes when it bought Adaptec's SnapServer NAS business for $3.6m. Assimilating that resulted in another 53 people losing their jobs in August.

It then faced Nasdaq delisting because its share price had sunk below $1.00, and also needed extra financing to avoid running out of cash.

A $9m credit line deal was agreed in November and the company planned a reverse stock split to get its share price back up above the Nasdaq dollar limit.

Throughout this period the recession deepened. Eleven people were laid off in December when the course of the final calendar 2008 quarter became clearer, with insufficient sales revenue. The actual December sales revenues must have slumped alarmingly because Overland has now laid off another 53 people, a 13 per cut, with 258 employees remaining, and cut salaries too. The severance costs are $730,000, but there is no word on the annual savings.

In its 8K SEC filing about this, Overland says "its compensation committee is considering implementing a salary recapture plan through which each employee may earn a bonus equal to or exceeding the foregone salary depending on company performance".

Making sales is everything for Overland now. It just has to get the revenues in or it may run out of cash. There was $5.4m in hand at the end of the third calendar quarter of 2008, Overland's fy Q1'09, and that wasn't sufficient, leading to the subsequent refinancing.

Overland has been increasing its distribution channel bandwidth with, for example, Keating Technologies of Canada signed up in December. But the extra revenues generated by the expanded distribution channel haven't been enough, a point implied clearly enough by the small December and then large January headcount cuts.

The company is back on the ropes. If the next two quarters are as bad as the last one, or worse, then it will be tested to its uttermost. The fiscal Q2 '09 results statement is expected towards the end of this month and is likely to make grim reading. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Community chest: Storage firms need to pay open-source debts
Samba implementation? Time to get some devs on the job
Like condoms, data now comes in big and HUGE sizes
Linux Foundation lights a fire under storage devs with new conference
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
prev story

Whitepapers

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup
Learn why inSync received the highest overall rating from Druva and is the top choice for the mobile workforce.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.