Feeds

Storage vendor Overland on the ropes

Deepening recession forces staff and pay cuts

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Savaged by the deepening recession, beleaguered NAS, disk and tape protection vendor Overland Storage has fired 53 people and instituted a ten per cent pay cut for all remaining salaried staff.

Having laid off 54 people in April 2008, loss-making Overland was in the midst of a recovery from earlier misfortunes when it bought Adaptec's SnapServer NAS business for $3.6m. Assimilating that resulted in another 53 people losing their jobs in August.

It then faced Nasdaq delisting because its share price had sunk below $1.00, and also needed extra financing to avoid running out of cash.

A $9m credit line deal was agreed in November and the company planned a reverse stock split to get its share price back up above the Nasdaq dollar limit.

Throughout this period the recession deepened. Eleven people were laid off in December when the course of the final calendar 2008 quarter became clearer, with insufficient sales revenue. The actual December sales revenues must have slumped alarmingly because Overland has now laid off another 53 people, a 13 per cut, with 258 employees remaining, and cut salaries too. The severance costs are $730,000, but there is no word on the annual savings.

In its 8K SEC filing about this, Overland says "its compensation committee is considering implementing a salary recapture plan through which each employee may earn a bonus equal to or exceeding the foregone salary depending on company performance".

Making sales is everything for Overland now. It just has to get the revenues in or it may run out of cash. There was $5.4m in hand at the end of the third calendar quarter of 2008, Overland's fy Q1'09, and that wasn't sufficient, leading to the subsequent refinancing.

Overland has been increasing its distribution channel bandwidth with, for example, Keating Technologies of Canada signed up in December. But the extra revenues generated by the expanded distribution channel haven't been enough, a point implied clearly enough by the small December and then large January headcount cuts.

The company is back on the ropes. If the next two quarters are as bad as the last one, or worse, then it will be tested to its uttermost. The fiscal Q2 '09 results statement is expected towards the end of this month and is likely to make grim reading. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.