Feeds

UK.gov 'to create anti-net piracy agency'

'Rights Agency' and new regulations to hit P2P infringement

The essential guide to IT transformation

Updated Following its failure to foster a voluntary solution between ISPs and rights holders, the government will create a new agency and regulations to clamp down on copyright infringement via peer-to-peer networks, it's reported today.

A proposal for a body called the Rights Agency will be at the centre of anti-internet piracy measures, according to the Financial Times, which cited sources who had read a draft of Lord Carter's report on Digital Britain. The Rights Agency will be introduced alongside a new code of practice for ISPs and rights holders, to be overseen by Ofcom, according to the leaked draft. The final report is due out by the end of this month.

ISPs will be required to tell customers when they are suspected of illegally sharing music and films, it's reported. So far some major ISPs have trialled sending their customers' copyright infringement notices in partnership with the record industry on a voluntary basis.

The new regulations will also reportedly force ISPs to collect data on "serious and repeated infringers" that they would have to make available to rights holders in possession of a court order. It's unclear whether that means providers would be made to keep records of the content shared by committed filesharers.

There would be nothing new in requiring ISPs to keep logs of which customers are assigned which IP addresses when. That kind of data is already obtainable by court order, and has been used by rights holders to pursue alleged illegal filsharers. The vague reference to data collection is therefore likely to prompt concern from consumer advocates over potential monitoring of actual internet traffic.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) said yesterday that its consultation on peer-to-peer copyright infringement had attracted polarized responses. The government has long been committed to a rearguard action against illegal filesharing, but has been trying to encourage ISPs and rights holders to agree a voluntary solution.

A BERR spokeswoman refused to comment on today's report.

The creation of the Rights Agency will represent tacit admission of a failure of self-regulation. Figures from both the internet industry and rights holder organisations contacted by The Register today interpreted the leak as indicating the UK government intends to imitate the French's new Hadopi copyright enforcement body. It remains very unlikely that sanctions against consumers accused of illegal filesharing will go as far as the full internet cut-off mandated by Hadopi's "three strikes" process, however.

The BPI, which represents record labels, said it had been working with ISPs to agree enforcement sanctions since the six largest providers signed a memorandum of understanding on illegal filesharing last summer. "We envisage that this work will result in voluntary deals, enshrined in a set of codes of practice underpinned by regulation," it said.

The Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) said it was not aware of plans for the Rights Agency and could not immediately comment.

Separately today the IFPI, an international coalition of record industry bodies, said 95 per cent of music downloads are unlicensed. ®

Update

ISPA sent this statement:

ISPA is aware of rumours in the media today about Government plans for the creation of a new agency responsible for reducing illegal online file-sharing. ISPA understands that the Government is considering its options after it became clear that its preferred option as outlined in the recent consultation document was not supported by stakeholders. ISPA would expect a full consultation on any proposal for legislation from Government in this area and will comment when more details become available.

ISPA maintains that Government imposed regulation is unlikely to provide a satisfactory solution to this issue and believes that the emphasis should continue to be on educating the public about copyright and on developing alternative lawful distribution channels.

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.