By Anonymous CowardPosted Thursday 15th January 2009 00:41 GMT
Anyone that buys anything from a spam mail should be banned from computers, teaching and, breeding.
Anyone who enters details into a site linked from spam/scam mail should be banned from computers, teaching and, breeding.
I know it's harsh, however our office mail gets 90,000 spam mails and 2000 legit mails in a 28 day period (the joys of having a mail domain that's been around for 9 years.)
Eventually with no idiots to buy junk or fall for the fraud from spam the spammers will move on to something more devious but slightly less messy and irritating.
As to infected windows machines, of course they are, their the most common desktop systemm operated by joe average so they're the most complicated for attacks that depend on users being unprepared for attacks.
*ix boxes tend to be the target of more complex and focused attacks against specific targets but when operated by the normal linux user are only marginally more secure then a windows box. If every tom dick and harry had linux installed then you'd see massive networks of linux infected machines.
By Lionel BadenPosted Friday 16th January 2009 10:48 GMT
Well actually with the popularity of apple devices rising (not so much computers) we have already seen viruses been written to include them as well
So as for your argument in the other link
Meh
I understand bill is a good scapegoat (hell i use him too).
Spam was down, now back up and using odd charsets #
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 16th January 2009 11:25 GMT
Hmm the amount of spam I get did go down but now it's back up again and it's using UTF-8 encoded UTF-16 titles, like I can't tell those, I've just written a text translator that does just exactly that..
I mean why can't ISP's e-mail or contact in some other way people who's machine appear to be botnets and say "We've noticed a sudden rise in the amount of e-mail traffic".
Or how about blocking any e-mail being sent that's could be a forged address.
i.e myspamaddress@geoff.com when they've not sent one from there - okay would need some checking.. but since "web mail" based stuff all goes via http they'll probably switch to that...
Comments on: Next-gen botnet armies fill spam void
'massive networks of infected Windows machines' #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 14th January 2009 23:58 GMT
solution #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 00:41 GMT
Someone should tell the Government #
By Moss Icely Spaceport Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 03:48 GMT
Just to put a stop to that #
By Tommy Pock Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 06:58 GMT
@AC #
By Steve Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 08:26 GMT
"the ability to upload the Windows minidump crash dump file to a control server" #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 10:10 GMT
infected Windows machines #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 10:14 GMT
The stoopid thing is.... #
By Stu Reeves Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 10:44 GMT
@Stu Reeves #
By druck Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 11:24 GMT
@By Moss Icely Spaceport #
By Adrian Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 11:29 GMT
"I'm a little filthy, I'm a filthy little bot..." #
By Evil Auditor Posted Thursday 15th January 2009 11:29 GMT
@ tommy pock #
By Lionel Baden Posted Friday 16th January 2009 10:48 GMT
Spam was down, now back up and using odd charsets #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 16th January 2009 11:25 GMT