By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:46 GMT
That is the best title ever. I don't really understand the hostility towards twitter users that inevitably pops up in comment threads after articles that mention it though. This is the internet. Occasionally you're going to come across people doing things you don't like, and as that particular scale goes, twittering is pretty innocous.
By Ken HaganPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:51 GMT
"To its credit, and unlike many of its peers, Twitter gives users the option of surfing the vast majority of the site with the use of the secure sockets layer protocol, a measure that makes it harder for scammers to trick their prey."
It also turns you into a terrorist, though, since Jacqui/Phorm can't see what you're doing, unless they've forced you to use that "man-in-the-middle router" that I saw on comp.risks yesterday. (In the future, all internet traffic will be encrypted by default, but we'll be forced to give the keys to the authorities, who will stick them in the Uberbase, which they then make available to a few million stakeholders.)
By Mister_CPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 12:32 GMT
We had to find a suitable alternative word in the office after complaints about the C word by some of our office. Roll on a few web searches and we all agreed on "Pompom". Jamaican slang, apparently.
By James PickettPosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:04 GMT
Might this affect the cult of celebrity? If nearly everything connected with celebs gets fouled up then perhaps the shine will begin to wear off. I do hope so.
By PierrePosted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:26 GMT
The (in)famous blog 2.0 tool finally found a suitable use. Too bad they froze the accounts. Looks like some celebs will have to go back to the old press release method to keep the world informed of their bowel movements. Unfortunately the non-celeb who had their account compromised cannot do the same. I hope the world can survive without knowing when Joe Bloggs goes potty -in real time.
"The exception was the hijacked account of President-elect Barack Obama, which directed followers to visit a website that attempted to steal personal information"
Given the way the US wants all our details to travel there, and the supposed spying activities they undertake, this is sort of appropriate. Unless Obama manages to reverse the stampeding elephants.
Comments on: Twitter's veracity chewed up by Britney's four-foot vagina
hah! #
By hikaricore Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 02:13 GMT
Proper name for users #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 03:12 GMT
hmph. #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 05:15 GMT
Gadzooks ! #
By Diogenies Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 06:00 GMT
@AC ... What's wrong with "vagina"? #
By jake Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 06:22 GMT
Re Proper name for users #
By David Harper Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 06:57 GMT
@Anon #
By gabor Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 07:10 GMT
@Proper name for users #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 07:15 GMT
Re:hmph #
By Andy Worth Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 08:04 GMT
Re: Proper name for users. #
By TeeCee Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 08:05 GMT
@proper name for users #
By Steen Hive Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 08:42 GMT
Tiger = 4 foot pussy with razor-sharp teeth #
By Allan Dyer Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:35 GMT
@Anonymous Coward #
By Ground Rush Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:35 GMT
Haha #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:46 GMT
To its credit... #
By Ken Hagan Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 09:51 GMT
Re: Haha #
By Sarah Bee Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:04 GMT
@AC "Ha Ha" #
By Gulfie Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 10:16 GMT
At least... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 11:35 GMT
Re: Re: Haha #
By HFoster Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 11:51 GMT
@ Sarah Bee #
By The Mysterious Panda Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 11:58 GMT
@ AC / follow up to Ground Rush post #
By Mister_C Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 12:32 GMT
scampaigns? #
By Jerome Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 12:36 GMT
Cults #
By James Pickett Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:04 GMT
@Gulfie #
By David Taylor Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:05 GMT
@Sarah Bee #
By Graham Marsden Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 13:27 GMT
Not at all related, #
By Tom Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:26 GMT
Ha, twitter.... #
By Pierre Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 15:26 GMT
Appropriate? #
By Dave Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 16:16 GMT
@Ken Hagan #
By Nebulo Posted Tuesday 6th January 2009 20:37 GMT