The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Yahoo! to! kill! most! search! engine! data! records! after! three! months!

Raises anonymisation bar

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Yahoo! has taken Microsoft’s demands for internet giants to slash the time they keep online search query data to six months, and raised it by anonymising most of the info after just 90 days.

The search engine firm announced today that it would decrease its data retention from a standard of around 13 months to three months for most of its users. However, it will keep data for up to six months if fraud or security breaches are involved, said Yahoo!.

"This policy represents Yahoo!'s assessment of the minimum amount of time we need to retain data in order to respond to the needs of our business while deepening our trusted relationship with users," said Yahoo! policy and privacy chief Anne Toth. "We're proud this new policy sets a new benchmark for the industry."

In recent months European regulators have been grumbling about the amount time of the likes of Yahoo!, Google and Microsoft store user data garnered from web searches.

Just last week Microsoft said it would only agree to European demands to cut the time it keeps online search query data if Google and Yahoo! adopted the same methods.

Google has long argued that keeping the data meant it could offer improved services and cope better with combating fraud and spam.

However, in September this year Google agreed to half the amount of time it retains IP addresses and user data taken from search query logs. The internet kingpin said it would anonymise IP addresses on its server logs after nine months “to address regulatory concerns to take another step to improve privacy for our users”. ®

Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime

Latest Comments

Confused ?

Under EU data retention laws won't your search engine query URL be stored by your ISP for up to two years anyway no matter what Yahoo does ?

0
0

Sounds like cost saving to me

It must cost a lot to store this data. Cutting down to 3 months sounds like a good way to save a few bucks to me.

It's not like Yahoo is exactly flush with money right now.

They've turned cost saving into PR. Clever though, full points for the effort.

0
0

Thank! God!

You've! finally! titled! a! Yahoo!! article! properly!

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?
 breaking news
O2 averts strike action over mass Capita outsourcing deal
Details of new agreement not yet released