Feeds

FCC kills Puritanical wireless vote

After whinging from Pres, lawmakers

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

The US Federal Communications Commission has canceled the December meeting where it was scheduled to vote on chairman Kevin Martin's plan for free US-wide puritanical wireless broadband. But the commission says the proposal will "remain in circulation for the commissioners to vote" in the future.

The meeting would have dealt with several other issues as well, but the powwow was canceled following complaints from lawmakers and the Bush administration over the free wireless plan.

Under the plan, the FCC would auction off the spectrum between 2155- and 2180-MHz on the US dial (part of the Advanced Wireless Services, or AWS, band), and the winning bidder would have no choice but to plant a free network on a portion of that 25-MHz. The commission would also require "family-friendly" filters designed to rid the free bandwidth of porn and other smut.

The proposal has received ongoing opposition from wireless carriers, ISPs, and handset manufacturers as well as consumer advocates. The incumbent wireless industry doesn't like being told what to do with the airwaves. And the consumer advocates don't like the no-smut bit.

Then, on Wednesday, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez sent Martin a letter saying that the president and his lame-duck administration was against the plan. "I understand that the draft AWS-3 order would constrain a provider's use of this spectrum, favoring a particular business model and potentially precluding the spectrum from allocation to the most valuable use," Gutierrez said (PDF).

"In particular, one mandate would require that the licensee provide free broadband services at government-mandated speeds. This mandate would likely lead to congested and inefficiently used broadband, and it would be inconsistent with the Administration's view that spectrum should be allocated by markets rather than governments."

Then, on Friday, Senator John Rockefeller, (D-W.Va.) and Congressman Henry Waxman - who chair the Senate and House committees that oversee the FCC - sent a letter to Martin and the FCC asking the commissioners to focus their attention on the transition to digital television scheduled for early next year.

The FCC did not respond to phone calls requesting comment. But a spokesman told The Wall Street Journal, that in light of the letter from Rockafeller and Waxman, "it does not appear that there is consensus to move forward and the agenda meeting has been canceled." ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Of COURSE Stephen Elop's to blame for Nokia woes, says author
'Google did have some unique propositions for Nokia'
FCC, Google cast eye over millimetre wireless
The smaller the wave, the bigger 5G's chances of success
It's even GRIMMER up North after MEGA SKY BROADBAND OUTAGE
By 'eck! Eccles cake production thrown into jeopardy
Mobile coverage on trains really is pants
You thought it was just *insert your provider here*, but now we have numbers
Don't mess with Texas ('cos it's getting Google Fiber and you're not)
A bit late, but company says 1Gbps Austin network almost ready to compete with AT&T
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.