Feeds

Intel takes legal swing at Korean antitrust decision

Chipzilla insists 'biz practices are fair and lawful'

Security for virtualized datacentres

Intel is taking South Korea’s fair trade watchdog to court after it decided to fine Chipzilla for undercutting its semiconductor rivals.

The company filed a formal complaint at the Seoul High Court yesterday in an effort to overturn the Korea Fair Trade Commission’s decision.

The watchdog ordered Intel to cough up $18.6m for violating fair trade rules. The Commission ruled that Intel paid rebates to South Korean computer firms to undercut arch rival AMD.

Intel was charged by the regulator in June last year for violating antitrust laws following a two year investigation into the company’s business dealings in South Korea.

AMD has consistently argued that the rebates Intel offers are an illegal attempt to maintain and extend its monopoly.

Intel meanwhile continues to insist that the discounts aren't predatory, but rather a legit discount system that bases prices on the volume of processors a customer buys.

An Intel spokesman told the Associated Press yesterday that the firm sees the legal action as an "opportunity to demonstrate that our business practices are fair and lawful".

He added: "Our prices have always been above cost and profitable." ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.