Just don't use Facebook/Myspace et al.

I don't have any use for such on-line tat.

The NoScript plugin can't help you with any Facebook security vulnerabilities... To use Facebook, you need Javascript, so you need Facebook whitelisted in the NoScript configuration. Because it's whitelisted, you are now vulnerable to any XSS attacks, because XSS vulnerabilities usually mean injecting Javascript into files that are sourced from Facebook. So, either you use Facebook, and are vulnerable whether you have NoScript installed or not, or you don't use Facebook, in which case you don't need NoScript to protect you.

or do the examples not work?

Am I the only one who read this as Knobface?

/yes yes I'm gone

NoScript is able to distinguish XSS from JavaScript running locally. Its XSS filter even remains active when you allow js globally. For example embedded Youtude vids are blocked until you explicitly allow them.

And *everybody* should use NoScript -- XSS attacks are very common, and malicious js is not just limited to obscure corners of the web. Even big sites get compromised sometimes.

"....quick-moving attack targeting Google Orkut....."

Ok, exactly how long did it take to affect *both* users?

And frankly anyone not using NoScript, AdBlock Plus and Adblock Filterset.G Updater is a bit stupid. And anyone not capable of or getting annoyed over operating NoScript shouldn't be let anywhere near a computer.

Three hours after publishing? Whether or not Facebook is of any value, well done El Reg!

Named and shamed...

I tried using NoScript. I love the idea of it in principal. Unfortunately half an hour of using it will made me realise how much of the web depends on Javascript. The majority of sites I visited were completely broken and I have to keep whitelisting things to the point that it seemed utterly pointless.

If pretty much breaking the entire Internet is your idea of a fix then I'd rather be broken. Here's a similar fix: Turn off your computer.

I went back to using Flashblock instead.

I'd love it if Javascript wasn't used so (IMO) gratuitously. (It's used wonderfully on many sites but on others, where you're being served a static page, it makes me wonder WTF the site authors were thinking.) If I only had to whitelist a few sites, like I do with Flashblock, then NoScript would be great. Having to whitelist a huge number of sites is a giant hassle and makes me question what I'm protecting myself from when so many things are granted an exception.

No mate, you're not. So, this coat rack is starting to look bare...

the Facebook engineers were busy sitting reading The Register rather than checking their mailboxes - who would argue based on clear evidence?!?

Paris, because she keeps her eyes on the right kinda ball!

Examples work for me...

@James Roper:

Please RTFM, before posting misinformed comments: http://noscript.net/features#xss

more like REDfacebook amirite

Care to bet your life on that?

NoScript is more of a pain than a saviour, not least because of the false sense of security that its users have.

... and it's without NoScript.

Perhap you should RTFA and note they were closed within 3 hours of this article being posted?

Top article.

Hey AC, Adblock Filterset.G does not work with AdBlock Plus and, in fact, the AdBlock Plus folks tell you not to install it if you have AdBlock Plus (http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g).

I wonder if Firekeeper would catch it... it picks up some other attacks.

No gosh-dern good would come 'a these whipper-snappers and their gosh derned Web 2.0!