The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

HP claims market-topping 2.5-inch storage

Our 300GB is bigger than your 300GB

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

Update HP is shortly to launch a 300GB 2.5-inch hard drive claiming it will have "more storage capacity than any other SFF drive in the market." Both Fujitsu and Seagate's have 300GB 2.5-inch drives already. What's going on?

El Reg was pointed to HP's Reality Check: Server Insights blog and found this: "Have you been waiting for higher capacities on your 2.5-inch small form factor (SFF) drives? HP will launch the 300GB 3G SAS 10K SFF Enterprise Drive shortly. With this drive, you will get more for less: More storage capacity than any other SFF drive."

Alone amongst the big server vendors, HP tweaks hard disk drives and sells them as HP-branded drives. Remember FATA? That was HP's way of making SATA drives usable in Fibre Channel arrays with FATA standing for Fibre-Attached Technology-Adapted. The things have been rendered more or less redundant by SAS and especially SAS 2.0 with its 6Gbit/s interface which outpaces the 2 or 4Gbit/s FC drive interfaces.

HP's new 300GB SFF drive will have, it says, 75 per cent power savings over comparable 3.5 inch 300GB capacity drives, a 60 per cent improvement in system level performance over 3.5-inch 15K drives, and the industry’s longest field tested reliability SFF drive delivering lowest operational and support costs (according to supplier tests). The supplier isn't named.

The 75 per cent power saving becomes a 50 per cent power saving when compared to a 3.5-inch 15K drive.

Both Fujitsu and Seagate have 300GB 10K SAS (6Gbit/s) SFF drives. We'll look at Seagate as it was a drive supplier for HP's FATA line.

Seagate's Savvio 10.3 product has, the company says, a 67 per cent power saving over a 3.5 inch 15K drive, giving Seagate a power-efficiency advantage. Let's also assume that the Savvio's reliability is about the same as the coming HP baby drive.

Seagate also says its Savvio 10.3 product has a greater than 1.5x system-level performance improvement over 3.5-inch drives, not specifying whether they are 15K ones though. HP says its new product will have a 60 per cent system-level performance speed-up over 3.5-inch 15K drives. So let's assume the HP and Seagate drives have more or less the same system-level performance improvement. We're left with the situation that HP is going to ship a drive with the same capacity as the Savvio 10.3, less power-efficiency and equivalent system-level performance and reliability. Why bother?

It's odder still with the Savvio having a full disk encryption facility and the HP blogger, an S Mathur, not mentioning encryption at all. Another mark of oddness: the blog entry was not posted on HP's Around The Storage Block blog which would be a more natural home for it.

Shipping not announcing

An HP spokesperson said:" We are announcing world-wide customer availability for 300GB SAS 10k SFF [Savvio 10.3 drives] running at 3Gbit/s ... HP is the first systems integrator to have these drives available for customers to purchase ... Our HDD partners have provided drives with 6Gbit/s SAS available for test, but customers cannot run 6Gb today."

"The discrepancy in [power savings] numbers is a case of different tests delivering slightly different numbers. The power savings [for] 2.5 vs. 3.5 [drives] are real."

Full disk encryption (FDE) is not being offered because: "Much like 6Gbit/s SAS, there is significant infrastructure on the system side to facilitate Full Disk Encryption. Many customers are unclear around their needs for enterprise encryption." This is something HP is working on with Seagate and others.

So HP is announcing that the drives, down-rated Savvio 10.3s in the SAS connectivity and FDE areas, will be available soon and reckons it will be the first supplier to actually ship them in products to customers. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Latest Comments

@Alex Lee

What's the performance of your SATA drive vs a SAS drive?

While the SAS drives don't have the larger storage capabilities of the SATA drives, they are faster.

The good thing is that with 2.5" drives in a 2U high server, you could put a set of 7 disks of SAS and a set of 7 disks of SATA in different raid configurations. With mulit-core xeon chips, your single server could now be both a web/mail/app server and a database server.

Add in redundant power supplies and you've got yourself a box that most SMBs would love.

Double this and use HDR on the database along with load balancing of your web app, and you have extremely good uptime and reliability for a very low relative price. (relative to what it would have cost you 5 years ago.)

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re. No comments allowed?

Try here, this blogs a little more active

http://www.communities.hp.com/online/blogs/datastorage/archive/2008/12/05/new-small-form-factor-drives-coming-soon-to-hp-server-and-storage-systems.aspx

0
0

No comments allowed?

I tried posting a comment on the Server Insights blog asking why this HP drive would be anything new or special, considering SFF drives that large and larger have been on the market for I think a couple of years. So far, the comment has not appeared, and there are no comments on any other item in the blog either. Anyone else want to try? I'm getting a sneaking suspicion comment "moderation" means "deletion" :-(

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches