The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Domain hijack fears over Gmail exploit

I didn't think 

Posted Monday 24th November 2008 12:16 GMT

anyone who valued privacy was stupid enough to use gmail for anything but the most trivial and insensitive of communications. I guess equating ignorance with stupidity could be seen as a bit severe. Whatever, the result is the same.

Don't use web based email services for private and sensitive communications.

a title shouldn't be required 

Posted Monday 24th November 2008 12:42 GMT

As far as I'm aware (and I could well be wrong), gmail is still in beta.

Anyone using a beta product for something that is important to them is pretty stupid.

@adnim 

Posted Monday 24th November 2008 15:21 GMT

Paris Hilton

as opposed to receiving email through the post?

@AC (Paris) 

Posted Monday 24th November 2008 18:32 GMT

No, silly. As opposed IMAP or POP3. Please remember, the web is not the internet.

Oh well.............. 

Posted Monday 24th November 2008 23:28 GMT

Go

may as well ditch gmail, its obviously no good. In fact I don't think I'll bother wit t'internet anymore - back to paper and pen...if only I could find a post office. Ha!

@Paul 

Posted Tuesday 25th November 2008 00:05 GMT

Thank you for educating AC. I just couldn't be bothered.

But even with IMAP and POP3 although less susceptible to 3rd party snooping and thus more secure, If the email is not encrypted...

Webcast: Jumpstart your Application Security initiatives