DCSF reins in ContactPoint scope for police and A&E staff
Frontline access frozen by political fears
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
The Department for Children, Schools and Families is resisting broadening access to the ContactPoint database for police officers and A&E staff, two groups most people would consider to be the frontline of spotting child abuse.
Staff from the department admitted that this was for politcal expediency rather that to prevent overly wide access to the controversial database.
ACPO raised concerns at a meeting of the Information Sharing Advisory Group in August that "children will slip through the net" unless police had broad access to the system. The meeting also heard how the ContactPoint Database will not be made available to NHS staff working in A&E departments.
A representative for the Department for Children, Schools and Families suggested at the meeting that using the ContactPoint system to check on every child was likely to be unnecessary.
This is in spite of the fact that the DCSF has repeatedly argued that total inclusiveness is absolutely necessary to improve detection of child abuse. It also undermines ministerial contentions that ContactPoint will help to avoid a repeat of the Victoria Climbié case, which was characterised by the child being brought at different times to different casualty departments.
The DCSF went on to resist pressure from an ACPO representative for greater availability to serving Police Officers on what look suspiciously like political grounds.
Responding to Police concerns that access to ContactPoint was too restricted, the DCSF observed that "the department would find it hard to go back to Parliament to say that 200,000 police officers would now like access".
It was at this point that the ACPO spokesperson expressed their concern that children might slip through the net and wonít be safeguarded. The DCSF response was: "You could not guarantee this anyway".
At the same meeting, a representative from the Office of the Information Commissioner raised the issue of how ContactPoint could be made available in a busy A&E department without compromising security.
A member of the Barts and London Trust questioned how checking on children in such circumstances could be possible. Various other committee members suggested ways in which wider access in A&E could either help support detection of issues of child abuse or help improve the use of resources.
However, the DCSF made it clear that agreement had been reached with the Department of Health for A&E visits to be recorded on the NHS System and that A&E visits tended to be for minor concerns anyway.
Responding to the above revelations, Maria Miller MP, Conservative spokesperson on this issue, said: "The government has a poor record when it comes to setting up and managing large databases and is unable to give an undertaking that highly sensitive data about children will be 100 per cent safe.
"The welfare of children has to be our paramount consideration and that is why we would scrap Contact Point and ensure safer collection of data at the local level with a focus on protecting the most vulnerable children."
This debate would suggest that the inevitable cracks are finally begining to appear in the ContactPoint project. The logic of ContactPoint - and the original justification for it - suggests that it should be as widely accessible as possible
However, public concerns over government handling of data mean that it is no longer acceptable to give it the degree of access it needs. Instead, each category of user is likely to have to feed their requests through local gatekeepers.
This will make it less effective - and also impact on the cost savings the government claimed ContactPoint would bring about. ®
COMMENTS
And they wonder why we dont' trust them...
I mean let me see if I get this right
the Database is for "social workers" and the leike so they can see if a kid from any area has already been spotted as a "potential abuse" victim and they can act on it, HANG ON...
The kids teacher, school nurse or A&E Personel are all more likely to spot something is a miss, than a bleeding social worker, I know there are a few good ones but most I think can't be bothered .
Unfortunatly in this day and age of "PC'ness" they can't do half of things teachers could do when I were a lad, sad really.
This looks like a way for social services to sit with their fingers in their ears humming loudly that they can't hear you etc, etc...
let us not forget...
that in the Baby P case the social services had the information but made a deliberate decision not to take action.
With ContactPoint does this mean the social service will make the decision not to act that much faster, thus allowing such abuses to drop under the radar even quicker? I think this is a very good reason to scrap ContactPoint.
Good call
This is not only a reasonable position for the DfCSF to take, but even if they had said "yes" to wider police access, it's difficult to see how this would have been achieved technically.
Project SENTINEL, a national project run by the then-PITO (Police IT Organisation, subsumed on 1 April 2007 into the National Policing Improvement Agency) was shelved in December 2006 for cost reasons. It was intended to produce a national police child abuse investigation case management system, following on from Recommendation 104 of Lord Laming's enquiry into the death of Victoria Climbié, and in fact the proposal had been agreed by all parties concerned... but there was allegedly no money to pay for it. Consequently, the police still have no way of knowing if a child or young person coming to their notice has been the subject of a child abuse investigation in the next force area, or indeed anywhere across the country.
I wonder what Lord Laming's view of that will be...?

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud based data management
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth