Mars lander has probably carked it, says NASA
Phoenix robot won't rise again
Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime
The Phoenix robot lander, situated in the arctic dune seas of Mars, has ceased communicating and NASA does not expect to hear from it again. The onset of autumn in the chilly polar plains of the Red Planet has, as was expected, meant that the probe's solar panels can no longer supply sufficient power to keep it running.
Mission engineers received a final signal from the lander on 2 November. Space-agency robo probe chiefs said that on top of shorter daylight, Phoenix has had to deal with dustier skies, more clouds and colder temperatures as autumn sets in on the dune seas of the Vastitas Borealis. However, Phoenix did well, lasting much longer than it had been expected to.
The project team will be listening carefully during the next few weeks to hear if Phoenix revives and phones home. However, engineers now believe that is unlikely because of the worsening weather conditions on Mars. "The spacecraft's work has ended," according to NASA, but the task of analysing the data it provided has only just begun.
"Phoenix has given us some surprises, and I'm confident we will be pulling more gems from this trove of data for years to come," said Peter Smith, a Phoenix brainbox working at the University of Arizona.
Phoenix was launched on 4 Aug 2007 and landed 25 May 2008, farther north than any previous spacecraft to land on the Martian surface. The lander "dug, scooped, baked, sniffed and tasted the Red Planet's soil". It confirmed the presence of water-ice in the Martian ground, and cameras also returned more than 25,000 pictures. These included snaps from "near the atomic level using the first atomic force microscope ever used outside Earth".
The probe, in its last weeks of operational service, also detected snow falling from Martian clouds, and was the subject of a mild internet kerfuffle which was resolved with the news that the best form of life for existence on Mars would be Terry Pratchett-style dragons with erratically explosive bowel chemistry.
"Phoenix not only met the tremendous challenge of landing safely, it accomplished scientific investigations on 149 of its 152 Martian days as a result of dedicated work by a talented team," said Phoenix chief Barry Goldstein of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. ®
COMMENTS
ALTAIR
Haven't heard anything about this "lander" for a while...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/617184.stm
Why drive across Mars when you can fly across the planet?
Meanwhile, looks as though Aber's CompSci dept has been up to other things...such as developing a robot scientist (I kid you not!)...and breaking the world record for long distance unicycling (must be the sea air...)
@Next Year, April/May etc...
For Phoenix, next spring is Oct 2009 next summer is May 2010, and Phoenix will probably spend much of the time until then under a cap of frozen CO2, where the temp will get down to about -180F, cracking the solar panels and circuit boards. So it is unlikely, if not impossible, that Phoenix will be re-reborn. That said, I believe the Russians are hoping that she does survive the spell in the freezer, and will be unlocked for other networks afterwards.
Mission accomplished and lessons learned
in the face of the poor track record of Mars landers getting even as far as the landing part of the operation, Phoenix has delivered admirably in what have proven to be very tricky conditions, and managing to extend its mission by nearly 50% must go down as a great achievement. My congratulations go to all involved, and I'm looking forward to the results that are still to come.
Until (if?) the Mars Science Laboratory arrives, let's not forget the little rovers that could, Spirit and Opportunity, now heading towards an astonishing 5th year of trundling about the Martian plains.

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime
SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had