By Red BrenPosted Friday 7th November 2008 15:03 GMT
"the government had allocated £29m over three years to implement the national fraud programme, which includes the establishment of a national fraud reporting centre."
So how does this work?
Me: I'd like to report an online fraud please.
NFRC: Of course sir, can I take your National ID card reference?
Me: Er, no I don't have one.
NFRC: Well I'm sorry sir but if you don't have an ID card, how can you prove it wasn't you who carried out the transaction? Would you like me to send you an application form so you can be protected in future?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Friday 7th November 2008 15:21 GMT
of reading the whole thing and so far they have not actually decided any plan of action or when talking about educating people the iwf hasnt even been mentioned.
By RichardPosted Friday 7th November 2008 15:52 GMT
I would glady pop over to the Lords lounge (at the govt expense of course) and explain the finer points of cyber crime. I only say that because I know more about it than prescott knows about pie fillings
By TeeCeePosted Friday 7th November 2008 16:34 GMT
"Ah yes, cybercrime. Isn't that where somebody steals music from a Popular Beat Combo?"
This will be overheard in the House of Commons bar, of course. Everyone there will be taking a less than vague interest in proceedings while actually getting down to the important business of waiting for the 3rd reading of "Members of Parliament expenses process (refinement) 2008 part II"
In the chamber will be a junior junior minister reading from a pre-prepared wafflefest, "doughnutted" by the other eight attendees from the government. The opposition benches will be staffed by four MPs who couldn't stay awake long enough to get to the bar and one who owns a computer, has used Excel to prepare his expenses once and therefore thinks he has a point to make which will get him an entry in Hansard.
Eventually a motion will be proposed to form a sub-committee to look into the problem with a view to reviewing the existing legislation. This will go through on the nod, cueing a shift-change in the bar.
By RotaCyclicPosted Saturday 8th November 2008 13:39 GMT
You can't ever realistically expect any one in goverment to have a serious informed discussion on anything related to information technology: they just don't have anyone qualified or with any real signifcant experience in the subject matter.
And yet, these muppets form all this legislation without really knowing much about it.
By Anonymous CowardPosted Sunday 9th November 2008 11:00 GMT
if you are going to fight modern day constantly evolving threats, not sure what a place 'famous' for defeating a typewriter would inspire :)
Thing is I don't think many who know their stuff want to work for the government, they would seriously have to juice the offer, it is not like meat space policing is it. Currently most use tools developed by others, the real script kiddies tend to be on the enforcement side.
Comments on: MPs (finally) debate cybercrime
Makes a change #
By dervheid Posted Friday 7th November 2008 14:12 GMT
Function creep #
By Red Bren Posted Friday 7th November 2008 15:03 GMT
Just got onto the last page #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 7th November 2008 15:21 GMT
Jolly time #
By Richard Posted Friday 7th November 2008 15:52 GMT
Thank God! #
By Ed Posted Friday 7th November 2008 16:06 GMT
I can see it now. #
By TeeCee Posted Friday 7th November 2008 16:34 GMT
Reads like.... #
By Michael Posted Friday 7th November 2008 16:55 GMT
Government taking action?? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Friday 7th November 2008 17:12 GMT
Serious debate? #
By RotaCyclic Posted Saturday 8th November 2008 13:39 GMT
Bletchley Park #
By David Pollard Posted Saturday 8th November 2008 18:17 GMT
Location should be in cspace #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Sunday 9th November 2008 11:00 GMT
Just before it is made a law... #
By Mathew Coomber Posted Monday 10th November 2008 04:21 GMT