Top aero boffin: Green planes will be noisy planes

'Nuke-plane' prof sees crusty/nimby conflict

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

One of Blighty's top aero engineers has tried to open up a debate on the conflict between quietness and greenness in the next generation of airliners. However, most of what he actually said has been obscured by a report stating that he is calling for the introduction of nuclear-powered airliners.

Professor Ian Poll FRAeS is a heavyweight aero boffin. On Monday night, he gave the annual Lanchester Lecture to the Royal Aeronautical Society, on the theme The Optimum Aeroplane and Beyond - rising to the opportunities and challenges of the 21st century. Among other things, Poll works at the Omega Foundation, a quango dedicated to sustainable aviation.

Prior to the lecture, Prof Poll spoke to the Times, outlining some of his ideas. The Thunderer then ran this piece, headed "Nuclear-powered passenger aircraft 'to transport millions' says expert".

New open rotor engines, as envisaged by Rolls Royce

Open rotor super-stingy engine. Pic credit: Rolls Royce.

Most of the article focuses on some trials run by the US military back in the 1950s, when it was thought that nuclear-powered bombers able to stay airborne for long periods would provide counterstrike abilities even after a devastating pre-emptive attack by the Soviets. A nuclear jet engine had some ground runs, and a converted B-36 did carry a working air-cooled reactor on a number of flights, but merely to gather data: it used ordinary engines to fly.

In the end, nuclear-powered submarines - much harder to locate than bombers - took on the nuke counterstrike mission, and the atomic aircraft idea was shelved.

But now Professor Poll is calling for the idea to be revived! That's news, though it seems a little far-fetched.

We gave the prof a call.

"I spoke to the Times for an hour and a half," he told The Reg. "I did mention the American tests - I said the idea of nuclear powered planes is not forbidden by the laws of physics, and it's the sort of thing which could happen beyond 2050, maybe. That was it, two minutes. But it's the only thing they wrote about."

So what did he actually want to discuss? How could the aviation industry wean itself off hydrocarbons, or at any rate use less of them?

"In the short term, we need to get new technologies into the new generation of single-aisle airliners," says Poll. "The existing planes will be replaced in ten years, they'll be flying for a long time - it's a big opportunity to cut down on fuel burn and greenhouse burden."

The professor believes that the key bit of tech which can be ready to go in time is "open rotor" engines, a bit like a modern high-bypass turbofans writ large and with the outer duct removed. Prototypes have been around for decades, showing potentially excellent fuel savings, but open-rotor engines haven't made it into airline service because they are so noisy.

In fact, that's the big debate in the near to mid-term future of aviation, according to Prof Poll. Not nuclear versus conventional, but noise versus carbon. Airport noise limits, says Poll, are already causing increased emissions. The in/famous Airbus A380 superjumbo, for instance, has a "cruise fuel burn penalty" which is a direct result of design steps taken to make it meet Heathrow noise limits.

Local campaigners and their insistence on noise curbs are actually damaging the planet already.

In the same sort of tradeoff, the professor says that open-rotor engines can certainly be made quieter - but at a price in terms of fuel burned and carbon emitted.

"It's a problem to be solved," he says. "But there will be a cost in terms of fuel economy, and therefore carbon... there's a contradiction there."

In other words, being against airport noise is not the same as being green - quite the reverse - unless you also believe/accept that air travel should largely stop. (That means a return to the days when travel, other than to go to war or to migrate, was strictly for the rich.)

Much of the hatred directed against aviation in the UK is actually noise nimbyism, then, not any form of environmental concern.

Indeed, if we as a nation actually want to get serious about reducing aviation carbon emissions - or be less dependent on imported fuel, an issue which will definitely need facing even if global warming is a total fantasy - we should tell people living near Heathrow to shut up and accept more noise. That's not something they're going to want to hear, of course. But do they have the right to destroy the planet and/or the UK's energy security, economy etc purely for their own selfish comfort?

That's the issue for the near future, then. Indeed, to inform the debate, Omega are currently running a study into the noise/carbon balance in open-rotor engines.

But what about the longer term, when the last of the oil really is gone - when the shale and tar sands have played out, when the polar caps and Russia and Iran have all been drained of every drop?

Will it be time for the nuclear jet then?

Professor Poll, fingers no doubt a trifle scorched after the Times piece, was unwilling to foretell a future of atomic planes. But he did say that indirectly nuclear-powered aircraft were likely in the long term.

"Look at France," he said. "They have nuclear powered trains, don't they? It's an electric train, but almost all their electricity is nuclear. So in a sense, that's a nuclear train.

"We could see aircraft in the 2050 timescale powered by various fuels - hydrogen, or perhaps synthetic hydrocarbons - and the fuel could be made using nuclear power.

"So yes, in a sense, that's a nuclear plane." ®

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Vulture 2 takes a battering in 100km/h test run
Still in one piece, but we're going to need MORE POWER
TRIANGULAR orbits will help Rosetta to get up close with Comet 67P
Probe will be just 10km from Space Duck in October
Boffins ID freakish spine-smothered prehistoric critter: The CLAW gave it away
Bizarre-looking creature actually related to velvet worms
CRR-CRRRK, beep, beep: Mars space truck backs out of slippery sand trap
Curiosity finds new drilling target after course correction
China to test recoverable moon orbiter
I'll have some rocks and a moon cheese pizza please, home delivery
What does a flashmob of 1,024 robots look like? Just like this
Sorry, Harvard, did you say kilobots or KILLER BOTS?
No sign of Ziggy Stardust and his band
Why your mum was WRONG about whiffy tattooed people
They're a future source of RENEWABLE ENERGY
Vulture 2 spaceplane autopilot brain surgery a total success
LOHAN slips into some sexy bespoke mission parameters
prev story


5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.