Feeds

NetApp's de-duping VTL arrives

Finally answers Data Domain, Quantum, and EMC

Boost IT visibility and business value

NetApp has added block-level de-duplication to its Virtual Tape Library (VTL) product line and claims an up to 20:1 de-duplication ratio. At last, the company has an answer to Data Domain, Quantum, and EMC.

Until now, NetApp VTLs used hardware compression only and achieved a 50 to 60 per cent reduction in data volume. With VTL de-duplication code up to 95 percent of data can be eliminated depending upon the redundancy in the backup data.

The de-duplication is not NetApp's ASIS technology as used in ONTAP. It has been designed and built from the ground up and uses variable length strings.

The de-dupe can be selectively applied. Not all virtual libraries in the VTL need be de-duped.

De-duplication is carried out after data is ingested, although incoming data is fingerprinted using a so-called rolling hash to speed later de-duplication. Within twelve months, inline de-duplication will be added together with the ability to auto-switch between inline and post-process de-dupe depending upon the de-dupe rate, so as to meet backup window limitations. This is roughly similar to Quantum's DXi technology. NetApp would like us to think that it's switching between inline and post-process modes will be better.

Another future addition is replication of de-duplicated data between NetApp VTL systems. Today, it is limited to raw data. A third roadmap item is clustering of the VTLs - something we can definitely expect in the future. There are, however, no plans to converge the VTL operating system with ONTAP. NetApp sees performance and scalability advantages through having a separate VTL appliance with its own O/S.

Despite this separation there is some investment protection because the VTL can be converted to a FAS3000 array whose storage hardware it is based upon.

NetApp says it is pleased to be able to offer de-duplication across all its product lines, taking a sideways swipe at EMC which does not. Existing NetApp VTL customers with maintenance contracts will receive the de-duplication capability at no charge. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.