Feeds

Eee PC maker readies Android phone for 2009

Could be more successful than its Windows Mobile devices

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Eee PC maker Asus will release a Google Android-based smartphone during the first six months of 2009.

So say unnamed company sources mentioned by DigiTimes, which suggests there's something in the claim.

It's also said that the phone could initially appear only in Asus' native territory, Taiwan. Later, it may be tweaked for what are called "overseas clients" - carriers, presumably.

Asus' old Eee girl

Asus Eee PC and friend: cuddling up to Android?

Asus already offers a range of Windows Mobile smartphones - we've reviewed the M930 here and the P750 here - but it has yet to win the carrier support that's essentially to take the company out of its unlocked-only niche into the wider mobile phone market.

Windows Mobile handsets are ten a penny, so the release of an Android-based device might be just the novelty Asus needs to stand out from the crowd. Its efforts to evangelise its Small, Cheap Computers to carriers will have raised its profile with European telcos.

Hands on: T-Mobile G1 Googlephone first look

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.