Feeds

Intel misses Competition Commission deadline

Chip giant waits for court decision

Security for virtualized datacentres

Intel has missed the deadline to respond to the Supplementary Statement of Objections sent by the European Competition Commission in July.

The Commission is investigating Intel for alleged anti-trust violations relating to its relationships with computer manufacturers. The original Statement of Objections was sent in July 2007, and outlined the Commission's belief that Intel is guilty of abusing its dominant position in the supply of processors by offering rebates to original equipment manufacturers who took a majority of Intel chips rather than chips from AMD.

It was further accused of making payments "in order to induce an OEM to either delay or cancel the launch of a product line incorporating an AMD-based CPU". Finally it was accused of supplying server chips at below cost in order to exclude AMD from the market.

In July 2008 the Commission made the additional statement accusing Intel of offering rebates to an OEM which promised to only sell Intel-based laptops.

But earlier this month Intel went to the Court of First Instance accusing the Commission of breaches of procedure which, if successful, would grant it more time to respond.

An Intel spokesman told the Register: "On October 14th we filed an appeal with the Court of First Instance (CFI) in Luxembourg. That appeal includes a request for interim measures that will make the October 17th deadline moot. We've filed an appeal to get more evidence in the case for the Commission to evaluate, and we are waiting on the CFI to rule on the interim measures (a delay in our filing) and the substantive issues we have raised."

The Commission said Intel had missed the deadline and the antitrust case is continuing, but that it would respect the Court of First Instance if it supported Intel's position.

The Commission raided Intel and Dixons Store Group International offices Germany and the UK in February this year. Intel has been under serious investigation since 2003 after AMD made complaints. ®

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

More from The Register

next story
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Monitors monitor's monitoring finds touch screens have 0.4% market share
Not four. Point four. Count yer booty again, Microsoft
Getting to the BOTTOM of the great office seating debate
Belay that toil, me hearty, and park your scurvy backside
Hey, Mac fanbois. HGST wants you drooling over its HUGE desktop RACK
What vast digital media repository could possibly need 64 TERABYTES?
In a spin: Samsung accuses LG exec of washing machine SABOTAGE
Rival electronic giant tries to iron out allegations
Lumia rebrand begins: Nokia's new UK web home is Microsoft.com
Yarr, them Nokia logos walking the plank and into the drink
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.