Feeds

Intel misses Competition Commission deadline

Chip giant waits for court decision

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Intel has missed the deadline to respond to the Supplementary Statement of Objections sent by the European Competition Commission in July.

The Commission is investigating Intel for alleged anti-trust violations relating to its relationships with computer manufacturers. The original Statement of Objections was sent in July 2007, and outlined the Commission's belief that Intel is guilty of abusing its dominant position in the supply of processors by offering rebates to original equipment manufacturers who took a majority of Intel chips rather than chips from AMD.

It was further accused of making payments "in order to induce an OEM to either delay or cancel the launch of a product line incorporating an AMD-based CPU". Finally it was accused of supplying server chips at below cost in order to exclude AMD from the market.

In July 2008 the Commission made the additional statement accusing Intel of offering rebates to an OEM which promised to only sell Intel-based laptops.

But earlier this month Intel went to the Court of First Instance accusing the Commission of breaches of procedure which, if successful, would grant it more time to respond.

An Intel spokesman told the Register: "On October 14th we filed an appeal with the Court of First Instance (CFI) in Luxembourg. That appeal includes a request for interim measures that will make the October 17th deadline moot. We've filed an appeal to get more evidence in the case for the Commission to evaluate, and we are waiting on the CFI to rule on the interim measures (a delay in our filing) and the substantive issues we have raised."

The Commission said Intel had missed the deadline and the antitrust case is continuing, but that it would respect the Court of First Instance if it supported Intel's position.

The Commission raided Intel and Dixons Store Group International offices Germany and the UK in February this year. Intel has been under serious investigation since 2003 after AMD made complaints. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.