The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

BBC's TV detector vans to remain a state secret

I saw one being pulled by a unicorn

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

The Information Commissioner has ruled against a request to force the BBC to reveal the inner workings of its TV detector vans.

Although most detection is done by database the Beeb still claims to maintain a fleet of vans which can tell if a particular address contains a TV. If you buy or rent a TV or buy a PC tuner card in the UK your address is passed onto TV Licensing. The BBC maintains a database of 29 million residential and business addresses which it can check for up-to-date licences. If there is no response to letters an "enquiry officer" is sent to the address. If householders refuse them access - which is quite legal - then a detector van will be sent.

The BBC, which runs TV Licensing, received a Freedom of Information request for information on the number of vans it runs and what technical equipment they contain. It was also asked if it uses handheld devices to detect TVs.

After answering part of the request the broadcaster refused to give further details because if it did so it would damage the public's perception of the effectiveness of TV detector vans. The ICO agreed that if the deterrent was lost some people would not pay their licence fee. The ICO ruled that not releasing technical information would serve the public interest of legitimate licence fee payers so no further action is required by the BBC.

The BBC supported its claim with evidence that a growing number of people are dissatisfied with paying the licence fee - it got 126 complaints in 2006-2007 compared to 60 in 2005-2006. It also pointed to "a number of blogs and forums dedicated to people who are dissatisfied with having to pay the licence fee. These sites are used by members to share information on the TV licensing system and how to evade payment."

The BBC's use of detection devices is regulated by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act and the related RIPA (British Broadcasting Corporation) Order. It is overseen by the Office of Surveillance Commissioners. The Beeb spends 4.1 per cent of license fee revenue on collection.

Although it is technically quite easy to detect a working TV, many people believe the vans only exist as an imaginary deterrent.

The full decision notice is available as a pdf here. ®

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

I can exclusively reveal

That TV detector technology is based on a microscopic black hole-driven subatomic polarised wave filter developed using parts from a crashed alien spacecraft. Unfortunately it doesn't work that well on viewers that don't have much brain activity, which basically makes it useless for finding viewers of daytime ITV.

1
0

TV License, don't you mean TV Tax...

I got red lettered by these twats so I phoned them up. I made it quite clear that I don't own a tele and don't intend buying one ever, since I have a projector and 6 foot screen for my xbox and dvd player etc. The lady was very nice and updated 'my account'. The best she could do was a 3-month update, which means that in three months I'll start getting letters again. I hate the way that you have to prove that you don't have a tele - it should be the other way around. And they're so aggressive about it too. "If you don't pay up you face a massive fine and buggery in prison by bigger-boys...." They don't give a flying fook if their information is incorrect.

BTW is there anyway to get your name taken off the BBC's TV license database? If you don't own a TV then why should your name remain on there?

Next time I won't respond to the letters at all. I'll wait until they send someone to the door... I'll open it wearing a mankini and I'll do an Alan Partridge on them - sit down, lift both my legs up so they can see my dinner and cry out "search me search me".

1
0

ICO are a fig leaf.

did they ask them how many people pay actually pay the tv tax?

i heard from an ex bbc tv exec it is "below 40%", but they like to keep the official figures quiet for the same reasons stated in the article.

Well, well, the ico in cahoots with the .gov

So much for the information commission. disgraceful decision....in the public interest my arse!

"we work for them" should be their slogan.

Is restricting ones ability to tv not against human rights legislation or something?

0
0

More from The Register

Soylent days and soylent nights
Food 2.0 fails the post-pub nosh test
Reg hack prepares to live off wondergloop Soylent
Our man puts eating people powder Food 2.0 to the test
Oracle's Ellison outlines plans for Hawaiian Electriclarryland
Solar-sourced eau d'Oracle the key to island revival
 breaking news
Who's to be the next Dr Who? Sherlock beats Maurice - says you
Cumberbatch EXTERMINATES Ayoade, Atkinson, Pegg - and Tilda Swinton
Chewbacca held up by TSA stormtroopers for having light sabre
'Mrauuun' 'Right, Chewie, giant man do need giant cane'
Waving an Eye-of-Sauron pulsating mock cock? STOP IMMEDIATELY
Mains-powered sex aid recalled ... Ultimate O turns into ultimate OH NO
ROBOT COW teaches Saudi kids where milk comes from
Udderly ridiculous bovine intervention is beyond the pail
 breaking news
I told you I'd be back: Arnie set for another career revival
Don't worry voters, Schwarzenegger's talking about Terminator 5
At #guardiancoffee, we can now TASTE THE FUTURE through a PRISM!
I have measured out my life in espresso spoons
Google erases G8 venue from Earth: Microsoft doesn't
Cameron and chums to hold confab in empty field, apparently