The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

PayPal glitch freezes sellers' cash for weeks

Cock-up not conspiracy

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

A problem with some PayPal payments being held by the company was just a glitch, not a cunning plan to claw more money out of buyers.

Earlier this year PayPal introduced a scheme to flag certain transactions it regarded as suspicious. Payment for items where eBay determined the buyer might be dissatisfied would be held for 21 days, or until the seller received positive feedback from the buyer. Then the funds would be transferred.

But a problem last month meant payment was not being released even after positive feedback for the seller had been posted. Extending payment terms to 21 days did go down with some eBay sellers.

PayPay told us:

A very small proportion (less than 1 per cent) of PayPal transactions on eBay are regarded as potentially posing a risk to buyers. This typically represents people who have not used PayPal before, who are selling high value items or who have recently received a significant amount of feedback from dissatisfied buyers. These transactions are held until the buyer posts positive feedback, up to a maximum of 21 days. Payment is released automatically after positive feedback is left, or after 21 days without any complaints from the buyer. This approach is intended to ensure that eBay is a safe marketplace for buyers and sellers. We communicate the policy clearly to our customers.

In September, for a few days, we experienced a glitch in the system that releases payments automatically after positive feedback has been received. It affected a very small number of payments, all of which were subsequently released. Only those payments normally regarded as potentially posing a risk to buyers were affected.

Forum posters and Reg readers who got in touch with us accused PayPal of deliberately sitting on the money in order to make a few weeks' interest. Reg reader Rob said: "By locking up the funds for 21 days after transaction, all its doing is covering the arse of PayPal and earning them interest at the expense of the sellers." There's more in the eBay forums here and here.

Opinion seems quite divided - PayPal and eBay are always either going to annoy sellers who get checked before getting paid, or buyers who feel they've been cheated because payment was made too fast. As several posters in the forums point out, if you don't like it, go and sell somewhere else.

The company also had recent problems with its top-up cards. These were all fixed by 11 October. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Latest Comments

Positive Feedback before goods are sent?

WTF?! In the past I have paid via PayPal for an item, and the item gets sent to me. I don't leave *any* feedback until I have received the item.

All this system is going to do, is give lots of positive feedback to people regardless of the service they provide.

Ebay gets to claim that it is more popular and safer than ever. Crooks can create a dodgy seller, have someone win/buy something and give good feedback, and then the crooks can send any old crap to the buyer. Too late to change the feedback!

While there aren't any alternatives to Ebay, people should look at Freecycle (http://www.freecycle.org/).

0
0

Me too!

Happened to me too. Useless gits. I would have a good rant here, but I've already done that on me blog. http://naich.net

0
0

Just comforting my opinion

I have never cared for Ebay and I have never liked PayPal (the name itself is a lie) which has always played fast and easy with people's accounts AND money, without any support worthy of the name.

And stuff like this just tells me I'm right.

If PayPal was a real bank, there's no way it could just hold you money like that. Real banks do not have that kind of problem. And with a real bank, if for some reason the web-banking portal is out of service, I can always go to the brick-and-mortar version or even just an ATM.

There is no way a real bank can lock my money from me unless it has a court order.

But PayPal thinks it IS the court.

Jackasses.

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
BBC-featured call centre slapped with hefty fine for unwanted calls
PPI pests: Swansea-based firm stung for £225k by ICO
Microsoft to open Windows Stores inside 600 Best Buy locations
Product showcases 'must be seen to be believed'
 breaking news
What did the Lehman Brothers implosion look like to a techie?
Insider tells all about the Gnab Gib at Lehmans
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
1-in-10 e-tomes 'are self-published'... most are 'rubbish' says book ed
Publishing man scoffs at go-it-alone writers, ursines still fouling in forests
 breaking news
Facebook RSS reader said to uncloak June 20
Secret event scooped by Scottish developer?
 breaking news
O2 averts strike action over mass Capita outsourcing deal
Details of new agreement not yet released