By aldudePosted Tuesday 14th October 2008 11:47 GMT
Not better for me - Installed Linux a while back and it's a complicated mess. Also, not sure how you get an improvement in stability, Win XP has never crashed in the many years that I've been using it (I use it every single day). Perhaps Linux is more robust against misuse by clueless fanbois?
I for one am pleased that there will soon be 4 fewer critical vulns in XP!
By KarlThPosted Tuesday 14th October 2008 14:25 GMT
If we who use Windows in part or exclusively, just for the sake of argument, agree that Linux is best, we're complete fuckwits for using anything else, and we would instantly migrate except that we're too stupid to know how, would that be enough for you lot to shut the fuck up?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 14th October 2008 16:55 GMT
You seem to have got away without succumbing to Linux fanboy Flame Attack Vector #7b: Those Who Say Linux Is Too Complicated Are Too Stupid To Use Linux And Deserve Their Windows
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 14th October 2008 17:13 GMT
I use linux at work - and see both the pros and cons almost every day, but come on ...
Some people on here feel an compulsive need to reply to every single Patch Tuesday article with a Linux circle jerk. Are you so insecure about your choice of OS that you feel the need to point and gawk every time another OS has to patch? Last time I looked, all the major linux distros update packages quite often, too.
Get a tissue, clean yourself off, and get back to work - since you have Linux, you should be so much more productive than everyone else, right?
By Anonymous CowardPosted Wednesday 15th October 2008 01:14 GMT
O-FFS... come on .... If you (like me) have a computer with any version of windows on it, you are already being exploited. If you (like me) have got a computer with a linux distribution on it, you can't install Crysis on it... and if you (like me) like to "right click" then you don't buy into the apple playgroup. Ok - that about covers the bloody fanboiz. - flame away t*rds.
Linux (Ubuntu in my limited case) - built by peer review, updates AFTER testing, customer support via massive forum: works fine, updates quietly in the background, continues to work fine. Browses great, asks sensible questions, provides realistic online security, free. BUT - no playtime unless you like soduko and winding up people on "el reg".
Windoez (XPerversions 2 and 3 for me), on the other hand^H monitor - built by committee, released 2 years before testing is complete, customer support via chequebook: works fine, but updates intrude on any other software running, microsh4ft software conflicts with micro$hit software, asks stupid questions (often two or three times), provides superficial online security, phuking expensive... BUT - plays BF 2142, san Andreas, Grid, Cod4, F.E.A.R., Rainbow 6, ToCA3, Command&Conquor AND Crysis.
Moral of this story - LEARN TO BUILD YOUR PC PROPERLY and take a course in "reading the bloody installation notes". I don't know.... apathetic bloody planet, I've got absolutely no sympathy.
By Blain HamonPosted Wednesday 15th October 2008 08:00 GMT
Meh. It gets old after a decade or two. You grow up, realise that OS flame wars are a waste of your time, and nothing good ever comes from it.
More so, you begin to realize that even if you don't use windows in the slightest, it's still important that it gets fixed. Think of all the spam and botnet traffic that reduces availible bandwidth upstream. Think of all the searchable data on you, stored on unknown servers, where a security hole could lead to identity theft.
Schaudenfraude is much less sweet when it can affect you as well.
By KarlThPosted Wednesday 15th October 2008 09:18 GMT
No-one's knickers are in a knot, nor am I a "windoze fanboi". It's just getting a little predictable - any story about Windows, someone posts a totally unrealistic "just migrate to Linux your problems will be over" or similar bit of geeky mental masturbation.
@AC - don't forget Flame 4x: "That May Have Been True In The Past But Recent Linux Distributions Aren't Like That", which frankly I now rank along with the frequent Creationist claims that evolutionary theory is about to be disproven any day now.
Oh dear. Compare Linux fanbois to creationists. Now the flames really will come in. Tee hee.
By JohnPosted Wednesday 15th October 2008 14:28 GMT
Ahhh. You gotta love them patches. I got patched up yesterday (along with the rest of the world, I imagine). Windows Update notifcation said the usual click here to download updates. This went quite nicely, but after a few minutes it was still stuck on "0% downloaded". I switched the computer off and tried WU from the start menu, This said it would take about 15 minutes. So I clicked Download. After downloading the 1st program it then ground to a halt. Cutting a long story short the whole affair took 3 1/2 hours and approximately 6 ot 7 restarts as WUn also tried to download the updates itself (this was a bit like War Games, as I couldn't stop it). At one time both WU's were downloading at the same time, and both wanted me to restart. Anyway, I eventually got patched up, but it wasn't as easy as it was on previous attempts.
Microsoft is a global organisation, so why can't it stick some servers in Fiji or in the 24 timezones, so when the world wakes up it can access the servers or it can get it's patches off a local server instead of crashing the network by having everyone downloading of the same servers at the same time, or am I being naive?
"No system is totally secure..." David (Matthew Broderick) Lightman War Games 1983.
Comments on: MS roll out exploit prediction with Patch Tuesday
A better solution #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 10:58 GMT
@A better solution #
By aldude Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 11:47 GMT
Here's my prediction… #
By Quirkafleeg Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 12:02 GMT
@AC 10:58 #
By Fraser Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 12:05 GMT
Overheard in a Windows team meeting the other day #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 12:14 GMT
@A better solution #
By Colin Millar Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 12:18 GMT
Look... #
By KarlTh Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 14:25 GMT
@AC 1214 #
By Fraser Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 14:47 GMT
Self-fulfilling prophecies #
By Kanhef Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 14:57 GMT
'A better solution #
By Chris Pearson Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 15:11 GMT
@ aldude #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 16:55 GMT
OS Justification #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 17:13 GMT
For every thing else #
By Iam Me Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 18:22 GMT
@Iam Me #
By KarlTh Posted Tuesday 14th October 2008 21:03 GMT
@KarlTH #
By Iam Me Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 00:35 GMT
usability, stability, adaptability... exploited #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 01:14 GMT
Thoroughly trolled #
By Pascal Monett Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 05:49 GMT
@Iam me #
By Blain Hamon Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 08:00 GMT
Except that #
By KarlTh Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 09:18 GMT
PATCHy.... to say the least #
By John Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 14:28 GMT
the dreaded non-disclosure #
By Paul Posted Wednesday 15th October 2008 19:02 GMT