US military fails to go RFID tag-tastic

RFID in policy, bar-coded in action

Securing Web Applications Made Simple and Scalable

The US Department of Defence is failing to follow its own mandate for RFID implementation despite sinking $12.2 million into the project, according to a report from the Inspector General.

The investigation found that of 327 shipments received and inspected, 220 fell within the RFID-tagging remit; but of those 220, 23 lacked a mandate for RFID in the contract. Officers simply forgot to add the clause, despite it being policy to do so.

The remaining shipments came from 127 suppliers, but 84 of those suppliers didn't bother using RFID despite a tag being required by their contract.

Back in 2003 the US Department of Defense and Wal-Mart both embraced RFID, and with two such significant backers the technology seemed to be inevitable. Both Wal-Mart and the DoD have the purchasing muscle to demand their suppliers conformed, and while smaller companies griped at the expense - neither Wal-Mart nor the DoD offered to pay for the RFID tags - they were told that it was the price of continuing to do business with two of the largest purchasers in the US economy.

Five years down the line and things aren't going quite as well as might be hoped. Wal-Mart reasserted its commitment to RFID on pallets in January this year, having failed to hit deployment targets in 2006 and shifted focus to in-store RFID usage in 2007. The retailer started sending out warning letters to suppliers threatening fines of $2 per untagged pallet - rising to $3 for persistent offenders.

While the DoD hasn't scaled back plans, and isn't threatening suppliers, given the level of enforcement that hardly seems relevant. It's hard to judge $12.2m well invested when the requirements are just being ignored.

RFID Journal has a more comprehensive look at the report, which can also be downloaded direct from the Office of Inspector General (pdf), but what they fail to mention is how much of the industry has been expecting Wal-Mart and the DoD to show how effectively RFID can revolutionise supply chains, and the threat failure presents to the whole RFID industry. ®

Application security programs and practises

More from The Register

next story
ONE EMAIL costs mining company $300 MEEELION
Environmental activist walks free after hoax sent share price over a cliff
HP, Microsoft prove it again: Big Business doesn't create jobs
SMEs get lip service - what they need is dinner at the Club
Arrr: Freetard-bothering Digital Economy Act tied up, thrown in the hold
Ministry of Fun confirms: Yes, we're busy doing nothing
Help yourself to anyone's photos FOR FREE, suggests UK.gov
Copyright law reforms will keep m'learned friends busy
Apple smacked with privacy sueball over Location Services
Class action launched on behalf of 100 million iPhone owners
EU's top data cops to meet Google, Microsoft et al over 'right to be forgotten'
Plan to hammer out 'coherent' guidelines. Good luck chaps!
US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account
Crooks don't have folders labelled 'drug records', opines NY beak
UK government officially adopts Open Document Format
Microsoft insurgency fails, earns snarky remark from UK digital services head
prev story


Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.