The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: IBM doubles Power cores

A few errors in this article. 

Posted Wednesday 8th October 2008 06:55 GMT

First I wouldn't compare the chipset of the x3950 to the power 570 and power 560. The power servers do not have a external chipset in the same sense as the x3950 do.

Try to have a look at this redbook that deals with the big brother of the power 570 the power 595:

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp4440.html?Open

Furthermore the new 4.2GHz power 570 with a maximum of 32 Cores is a 4 CEC (building block) system, hence each CEC have 2 CPU boards which each has 2 'sockets', giving it a total of 8 cores per building block.

The only problem I see with these new systems (power 560 and power 570) is that they have can house less memory than the power 550 and the 16 core power 570 per core.

I do think that the power 560 have been overdue for some time. But it is a nice upgrade from the p560Q which could house 16 1.8GHz power5+ cores and only 128GB of RAM.

// Jesper

Yeah But 

Posted Wednesday 8th October 2008 11:53 GMT

Jobs Halo

Can I run PPC Leopard on this thing?

Hmm, I wonder... 

Posted Wednesday 8th October 2008 13:59 GMT

Coat

Just curious to how Mac OS X would perform on this system? ;)

Nopes 

Posted Wednesday 8th October 2008 18:03 GMT

Well we won't know. And isn't this like comparing a hummer to a AEGIS Cruiser ?

But This guy did manage to get a very important windows program running on one of these boxes:

http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/systems/power/community/aix/AIX_Movies/PowerVM_Lx86.wmv

Just fun.

Don’t Miss

QualcommQualcomm proffers first smartbook platform

Smartphone spliced with netbook, see

MicrosoftSuppliers fall over themselves to support Exchange 2010

New species spreads to four new environments

Logitech_logo_SMMouse maker spends big on video conferencing

Eeeek... how much?

NetListNetlist goes virtual and dense with server memory

So much for that Cisco UCS memory advantage