Feeds

Woman sues EA over 'secret' Spore DRM

Digital rights rage

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

Electronic Arts may have tried to appease customers angered by slackening the Digital Rights Management (DRM) restrictions in Spore – but the game publisher's troubles over its use may have just begun.

On Monday, a class action lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of California on behalf of Melissa Thomas of Maryland and all others who purchased Spore in the US.

The suit claims EA intentionally didn't disclose Spore's DRM, known as SecuROM, which actively monitors the computer to prevent duplication and limits the number of times a customer can install the game.

Over the past few weeks, Spore's DRM has prompted a tempest of anger amongst customers over its installation restrictions and SecuROM occasionally knack for causing piracy false positives and interfering with a PC's hardware and other applications.

Also contributing much to the consumer ire are complaints that even if Spore is uninstalled, SecuROM remains on the PC.

"Although consumers are told the game uses access control and copy protection technology, consumers are not told that this technology is actually an entirely separate, stand-alone program which will download, install, and operate on their computer," the complaint states. "Once installed, it becomes a permanent part of the consumer's software portfolio."

The suit claims EA has engaged in "deceptive and unlawful conduct" by "secretly" including SecuROM in violation of California Consumer Legal Remedies Act and California's Competition Law, Business & Professions Code.

"No notice of its secret installation was provided to persons who loaded and uninstalled the Spore Computer game," the filing states. "No one was told that it was a separate program installing to the Kernel of the computer and that it could not be uninstalled."

Indeed, there doesn't appear to be any mention of SecuROM on EA's 29-page end user license agreement for Spore (PDF warning). The suit asserts all references of Spore's DRM are phrased simply as "online authentication," giving a false impression that the piracy protection is on EA's own servers rather than at the operating system level of the user's own computer.

The lawsuit asserts that Thomas would not have purchased Spore "and/or paid as much" had she known about SecuROM.

Customers have complained - notably on Amazon.com's user reviews of Spore - that DRM restrictions unfairly treat legitimate purchasers like criminals. Although DRM is intended to prevent piracy, the game was almost immediately cracked and illegally distributed on file-sharing websites without DRM, leaving many to feel that paying customers were rewarded with an inferior version of Spore.

SecuROM, developed by Sony DADC, has been adopted by several PC game publishers previous to Spore's release. Gamers have accused SecuROM of having similar functions to malware, arising in heated complaints of its use in popular titles like BioShock and Mass Effect. But because Spore has a broader public appeal, the DRM tool has received significantly more attention from customers and the media.

The lawsuit asks the judge to certify the complaint as a class action and award the plaintiffs the purchase price of Spore plus damages. A copy of the filing is available here (PDF). ®

Update

The SecuROM website appears to contains no reference or instructions on how the application can be removed. An email to support returns a form letter containing a link to file the company claims will uninstall SecuROM.

The reply reads:

"SecuROM does not install any malware, including viruses, spyware or Tojans, nor does it enable any third-party to gain access to your computer.

SecuROM simply downloads and stores SecuROM license data and information to assist with disc authentication and activation. This data and information does not affect your computer system in any way."

And I hadn't even mentioned viruses, malware, or nefarious things of that sort in my email. Clearly this kind of grief isn't something new for the company.

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Munich considers dumping Linux for ... GULP ... Windows!
Give a penguinista a hug, the Outlook's not good for open source's poster child
UK fuzz want PINCODES on ALL mobile phones
Met Police calls for mandatory passwords on all new mobes
e-Borders fiasco: Brits stung for £224m after US IT giant sues UK govt
Defeat to Raytheon branded 'catastrophic result'
EU justice chief blasts Google on 'right to be forgotten'
Don't pretend it's a freedom of speech issue – interim commish
Yes, but what are your plans if a DRAGON attacks?
Local UK gov outs most ridiculous FoI requests...
Detroit losing MILLIONS because it buys CHEAP BATTERIES – report
Man at hardware store was right: name brands DO last longer
Snowden on NSA's MonsterMind TERROR: It may trigger cyberwar
Plus: Syria's internet going down? That was a US cock-up
UK government accused of hiding TRUTH about Universal Credit fiasco
'Reset rating keeps secrets on one-dole-to-rule-them-all plan', say MPs
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.