Feeds

Stob latest: IEEE flags dodgy paper

Cleaning up after peer review

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

After a series of emails with IEEE board member and the institute's director of products and services, Evan Butterworth, we received this statement:

First, after a review of IEEE publication policies and procedures, we've determined that it would be appropriate to flag the article in our database. We are currently addressing that, and the flag should appear the next time we do a download of articles into the database - some time within the next 5 to 10 days. The flag will clearly alert researchers that the content of the article may not be reliable. I've appended the full text of the flag below my signature.

Second, it is our practice to regularly review and revise our policy manual, and we intend to consider what we have learned from this situation as part of that process.

Again, thank you for your diligence in bringing this situation more broadly to our attention. The IEEE is committed to ensuring the integrity of our scholarly publishing process, and the soundness of our research database.

And here's the new text appended to the Madanmohan and De' paper:

Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles

“Open Source Reuse in Commercial Firms” by T.R. Madanmohan and Rahul De in IEEE Software, Vol. 21, Issue 6, November/December 2004, pp. 62-69

After careful and considered review of the content and authorship of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE's Publication Principles.

This paper contains portions of original text from the sources cited below. Text from Paper 1) was reused without attribution. Text from Paper 2) was reused with attribution but without being clearly delineated from the above authors’ own text.

1) "Open-Source CMS: Prohibitively Fractured?" by Tony Byrne in CMS Watch, http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/89-Open-Src 14 May 2003, pp 94-99

2) “The Amos Project: An Approach to Reusing Open Source Code” by Manuel Carro, Germán Puebla and Carlo Daffara in Presente y futuro de la ingeniería del software libre URJC, Madrid, May 21, 2003

As Verity noted, the paper continues to be widely cited.

Stay tuned - there's much more to follow. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
'In... 15 feet... you will be HIT BY A TRAIN' Google patents the SPLAT-NAV
Alert system tips oblivious phone junkies to oncoming traffic
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
SMASH the Bash bug! Red Hat, Apple scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
'Google is NOT the gatekeeper to the web, as some claim'
Plus: 'Pretty sure iOS 8.0.2 will just turn the iPhone into a fax machine'
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
'People have forgotten just how late the first iPhone arrived ...'
Plus: 'Google's IDEALISM is an injudicious justification for inappropriate biz practices'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.