By RichardPosted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:26 GMT
"Curiously, the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal never became the topic of a malware attack"
Presumably for the same reason as the non-existent Curry/Major sex tapes. Dare one say that no attractive women (-ish, or at least moreso than a hippo) were involved?
By Chris GPosted Tuesday 9th September 2008 17:07 GMT
Or even stupid to open any of these spurious news flashes. I get them all the time on MSN live and yahoo but both accounts automatically class these as spam. Even if they didn't, the same old thing applies, if you don't know the sender don't open it.
Frankly, anyone who is sad enough to want to see Obama getting his rocks off on screen deserves all they get.
By Jon TockerPosted Tuesday 9th September 2008 23:17 GMT
are quite right: anyone who gets caught by this deserves everything they get - which should also include their name, email address, telephone number and any images from their web cam being harvested and submitted to a "Top Internet Fucktards" site so we can identify these morons and amuse ourselves by emailing/calling them and saying "BWAhahahahahahaha, wot a fuckwit!"
Sadly, malware these days seems focussed largely on making the affected machine into a slave of the baddies so it actually is a bad thing for the rest of us when morons get themselves infected.
I yearn for the good old days when the malware actually deleted stuff off the hard-drive or fucked up the computer in some way (reformatted drives, flashed BIOS etc) - no skin off my nose if some dumb bunny loses their life's work because they wanted to watch Obama gettin' it on...
By heystoopidPosted Wednesday 10th September 2008 23:36 GMT
So these guys deserve a medal or two as all the dumb insular stupid rednecks fall for that one hook line and sinker , as these self effacing idiot get what they deserve and deserve what they get , let these fools get burned .
As a certain socialite would say "Ha! Ha! , got you again fool !"
Comments on: Obama strumpet-sex scandal ruse spreads malware
hmmm #
By Martin Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:07 GMT
How do you show something implausibly? #
By Robert Grant Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:26 GMT
Monica == Reggie Perrin's mother-in-law #
By Richard Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:26 GMT
Thank GOD... #
By Ian Bonham Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:48 GMT
Exploit tagetting political conservatives? #
By ian Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:54 GMT
Why is This News? #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 16:56 GMT
You have to be dim #
By Chris G Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 17:07 GMT
Republicans will do anything ... #
By Michael N. White Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 17:33 GMT
errr... #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 20:30 GMT
@ Richard #
By Sceptical Bastard Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 20:40 GMT
Psssssssst #
By kain preacher Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 22:09 GMT
Chris G and Sceptical Bastard... #
By Jon Tocker Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 23:17 GMT
@Sceptical Bastard #
By Les Matthew Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 23:48 GMT
Funniest ones I saw... #
By Neoc Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 23:59 GMT
I misread that #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 10th September 2008 00:08 GMT
Re: You have to be dim #
By Shakje Posted Wednesday 10th September 2008 01:01 GMT
One Tory commented #
By Saucerhead Tharpe Posted Wednesday 10th September 2008 09:00 GMT
That's what happens when Focus on the Family #
By Sandra Greer Posted Wednesday 10th September 2008 23:29 GMT
So #
By heystoopid Posted Wednesday 10th September 2008 23:36 GMT