Feeds

Does Microsoft already own the BPM space?

Incumbency creep

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The essential guide to IT transformation

Reg Tech Panel Business Process Management is not a particularly new term, but it has received a pretty big boost in visibility recently as some vendors seem to be positioning it as the next big thing in IT.

The problem is that the term means different things to different people – vendors and users alike. Apart from the fact that the associated initialism, BPM, can also stand for “Business Performance Monitoring” in some circles and “Business Process Modelling” in others, the “Business Process Management” flavour of BPM in itself is used to refer to everything from process modelling and simulation, through document centric workflow engines, to middleware technology for coordinating web services requests between systems.

The danger is that if this bandwagon really gets rolling, all sorts of things will be thrown on the back of it on the premise that they help organisations to automate, monitor and manage the evolution of the business processes that underpin their operations – which is basically what BPM is about.

In the meantime, there is a good chance that Microsoft tools will spring to many people’s minds when you mention business processes and how they are designed, documented and communicated. Whether it is PowerPoint based process diagrams embedded in (or backed up by) Word documents, more structured diagrams produced in Visio, or process performance data collated and analysed in Excel, the likelihood is that Microsoft will be in the mix somewhere.

And if you need more, Microsoft is there with workflow solutions, middleware, analytics, and a lot more - so why would you ever look to BPM technology from the likes of IBM, Oracle, or specialists like Lombardi?

Well, you tell us. Are lightweight desktop tools adequate? Is the potential of Microsoft creep acceptable? Do other vendors positioning strongly in this area with “BPM suites” have something to offer? Or is it all just more hype best ignored?

Give us your thoughts in the comment section below, or better still, complete our latest Reg Technology Panel survey and help us to really get to the bottom of what going on in the BPM space. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.