Asus goes official on extended Eee PC line-up
Competition engenders confused array of options
Undoubtedly feeling the pressure of competition, Asus has come clean on its ever expanding range of Eee PCs. And it's starting to get a little silly.
The range, according to Asus UK, now stretches to 12 models. In addition to the original 2G Surf, 4G Surf and 4G; spring's 900; and the more recent 901, 1000 and 1000H, we now see the 701SD, 900 16G, 900A, 904HD and 1000HD.
The original Eee was also known as the 701, so it's no surprise that the 701SD is essentially the same, 4GB SSD unit. The 'SD' suffix is warranted by a bundled 30GB external hard drive and 10GB of online storage.
The 900 16G likewise matches the 900, but this time both Windows XP and Linux versions have 16GB of solid-state storage to play with - the 900 offered 20GB with Linux and 12GB with XP.
Asus Eee PC and friend: now empurpled
Both 900 and 900 16G use an Intel Celeron M 353 processor. Not so the 900A, which uses a 1.6GHz Atom N270 instead. It will be offered in 8GB and 16GB SSD forms - the existing Atom-based 901 has, like the 900, 12GB with XP or 20GB with Linux. The 900A will only be offered with Linux.
And it'll come in a purple casing.
All of the 900-something machines come with 1GB of RAM. The 904HD comes with 2GB if you opt for Linux; 1GB if you go for XP. It's a 900 with an 80GB hard drive instead of an SSD. Its casing design is that of the 901, even though it's innards are those of the 900.
So does the 1000HD. However, unlike the similarly 80GB HDD-equipped 1000H, this model is based on the aforementioned Celeron M 353 CPU, not the Atom N270. And it lacks the 802.11n Wi-Fi support provided by the 1000 and 1000H - it's 802.11b/g only.
Whereas the 1000H comes with 1GB of memory no matter what OS you prefer, the 1000HD comes with 1GB when you pick XP, and 2GB when you go for Linux.
Surely the extra memory would be more use to Windows users?
There's no word yet on the new models' prices - in the gaps between the others, presumably. What we can say is that Asus must be pretty worried if it feels the need to come out with such a confusing line of options.
Come on Asus, cut out the muddle. KISS, folks, KISS.
Arnold Lieberman> Micro$oft won't licence the OLPC version of XP on machines with >1Gb RAM.
William Towle> ...as indeed it was with the 90x models.
Here it is in print: http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/145719/microsoft_to_limit_capabilities_of_cheap_laptops.html
Price in Aus
So you can base your guestimates for the others around that!
Asus needs to sort out the awful Xandros Linux first...
Don't get excited... You need Asus to sort out the buggy, slow, poorly supported Xandros-based distro which the Linux EEE's run.
As other posters have mentioned, video is choppy, and battery life sucks. Under Windows much is improved, but the Windows baggage kills the cpu (at least on the original 900 which I stupidly bought knowing the 901 was on its way!).
So far, theres only two serious-use OS choices I've found, Ubuntu where everything kind of works if you dick around long enough, or OpenSolaris, where enough works with a couple of packages that the rest doesn't matter.
Now I bought a usb DVD drive, I'm going to try a few other bits, like Fedora, but Redmond is going to catch the Linux boys with their pants down if they don't get a move on.
Buy the 901 Linux
My shiny new 901 with linux installed arrived this morning. It's excellent. Everyone should get one!
£ Win vs Lin
What I want to know is the size of the windows tax.
Up to now there has been talk of 12 vs 20G Flash making the prtice the same.
Now though, we seem to have a 1000H which is the same spec with either OS
BTW yes I agree the apparently silly wide range is to use up components and/or cope with the atom shortage
My choice? 901 or maybe 1000H with linux!