The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Third time unlucky for Elon Musk's Falcon rocket

Top Gear 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 09:47 GMT

Flame

has been there, done that.

Get him to watch the Robin Reliant Shuttle episode. That's how the British do things !!!!

Flames = best at back of rocket, not engulfing it !

Crash as often as PayPal? 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 10:06 GMT

Coat

Wouldn't you expect the rockets to crash as often as PayPal does? Presumably they use the same technology... it isn't rocket science you know! Oh wait, yes it is. Mine's the one with the tins of hydrazine in the pockets.

SpaceX also plans a larger and more powerful... 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 13:06 GMT

Coat

...FAIL next time.

Mine's the asbestos one.

The last irony.... 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 13:30 GMT

Alien

The ashes of James Doohan "Scotty" were on board..

now if here was still the engineer instead of a passenger...

Payload lost 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 14:42 GMT

They don't mention it explicitly but I presume the payload (a couple of satellites and a solar sail) was lost. I would have thought customers would want to see at least one successful launch before entrusting their gear to a SpaceX launch. Where do you even get insurance for an unproven venture like this?

Hint: Acme Exploding Bolt Company. 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 17:13 GMT

I think you can get the phone number from Wyle E. Coyote.

@ Dale 

Posted Monday 4th August 2008 22:45 GMT

Flame

They get customers because they offer huge, huge discounts. The rocket needs to carry mass anyway as ballast --- the rocket won't work properly without the correct mass distribution --- so they might as well carry a useful payload at the same time. Apart from anything else that also lets them test the payload deployment mechanism.

Personally, I want to know why the RocketCam footage cut out before we saw anything interesting happen. That happened on the other flights, too.

The usual starting trouble 

Posted Tuesday 5th August 2008 03:08 GMT

It's worth noting that virtually no previous orbit-capable rocket has succeeded without a string of early failures. The R7 (Soyuz) launcher, for example, is famously reliable today ... but not back in the mid-1950s when it was under development. The Ariane IV had about twelve failures in its first eighteen launches -- then had a spotless record for the next several dozen. And so on.

Losing three in a row is disappointing but hardly unprecedented; if they get it right with #4, all will be forgiven soon enough.

Say 

Posted Tuesday 5th August 2008 07:09 GMT

Paris Hilton

Say I wonder if the problem was similar to the great Euro Rocket festival of disasters when the French , German and Italian pieces spoke to each other in different binary language so that when one said go the one on top said I'll think about it and the one in the middle said I prefer the crowd mode thankyou !

Re: Reliant Robin Space Shuttle 

Posted Tuesday 5th August 2008 08:34 GMT

The people who made said shuttle were awarded a "Arthur", by the British Interplanetry Society, for their work, as it was the largest rocket to be launched in the mainland U.K...

Don’t Miss