Feeds

SAP defends forced price hike against user anger

'If you don't want it now, you will later'

New hybrid storage solutions

SAP today rejected claims by British customers that its new support pricing scheme will unfairly slap small and medium-sized businesses with extra costs for services they won't use.

The UK SAP users group released a statement on Friday urging the German software giant to rethink a compulsory hike in support costs from 17 per cent to 22 per cent of contract value. Over the next four years all customers will be shunted from Standard support to the Enterprise package, which includes cover for non-SAP software.

Company spokesman Bill Wohl denied the enforced changes are aimed at swelling SAP coffers. "Our motivation here is not the bottom line," he said. "They [user groups] have their perspective, and customers never want to pay more."

There may be a few tea>>>keyboard support call outs as a result of that denial. The real terms costs increase will be about 30 per cent, and analysts have estimated that the migration will be worth €1bn annually to SAP by the time it is complete in 2012.

Alan Bowling, chairman of the UK SAP users group, said on Friday: "Many of our members may not want or need this extra level of support."

Wohl argued that the existing support package is outdated, and that smaller outfits whose IT systems do not yet require the higher-specced offering will grow into it. "What we're bringing to customers is what they've been telling us they want," he said. "We don't think the standard support package has kept pace with today's IT environments."

SAP said that its own contact with customers over the price increases had been "quite positive", but that it had made some minor changes in response to criticisms. Complaints from German customers led to the timetable being relaxed to allow outfits running legacy systems to catch up. Further tweaks are possible, Wohl said.

Conceding that the move is bound to upset some customers, he challenged the gripers to examine the competition. "The increased value justifies the additional expense... when you make comparisons between SAP and Oracle and SAP and Microsoft, our offering has significantly more value."

That's fighting talk. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
Multiple desktops and live tiles in restored Start button star in new vids
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.