Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime
However, you'll notice that NSFrameView implements a method called _shadowType, which returns a bit-mask; effectively, an integer between 0 and 31. Leopard uses subtly different shadowing effects depending whether the window is a utility window, a sheet, or a normal window, whether it is opaque, is the key window, and so on.
What if you want your app to really, er, stand out from the crowd? Do you remember some earlier betas of Leopard? One release had a much more forceful looking window shadow than currently used. If you want to experiment with this, sub-classing the window frame is, once again, the only way to travel. Take a look at the following code:
- (void) _setShadowParameters
{
extern OSStatus CGSSetWindowShadowAndRimParameters (void * cid, int wid,
float standardDeviation, float density,
int offsetX, int offsetY, unsigned int flags);
int stype;
if ((stype = [self _shadowType]) != [self shadowState])
{
[self setShadowState: stype];
CGSSetWindowShadowAndRimParameters ([NSApp contextID],
[_window windowNumber],
35.0, 0.75, 0, 28, 0);
}
}
The _setShadowParameters method is called, as needed, to set the shadow parameters associated with the window. Normally, this method looks at the type of window and sets the appropriate type of shadow. Here, we've overridden that behaviour and used the undocumented GSSetWindowShadowAndRimParameters routine to give the window a much more imposing screen presence!
You'll find that it's possible to push the standardDeviation and density values quite a bit higher than I've done, but don't go mad or you'll get unpleasant boundary effects appearing. You have been warned!
As ever, you can download the demo application and source code here.®
COMMENTS
I too am starting to wonder about the point
There are so many interesting _supported_ parts of Cocoa that could use articles like these...why do we care about hacking around in private methods?
RE: Appearance...
> The Mac OS X restrictions help reduce bad design. It's pretty
> rare that you find a freeware or shareware OS X application
> that looks like shit.
True enough. I remember when VB first came out for the PC, and everyone freaked because of the psychedelic user interfaces that could be put together with a few mouse-clicks.
Personally, in a commercial app, I'd hardly ever see the justification in using these specific techniques, unless I was intentionally setting out to create an alternative look like -- as you say -- the PowerGoo stuff. Next month, I promise to be much better behaved.... but still undocumented.... ;-)
Dave
Appearance
It is possible to have a window with no header, essentially enabling you to make your own UI. Kai's PowerGoo is one application that decided to make their own GUI... and I think they intentionally made it confusing.
Windows has a lot more flexibility when controlling aspects of the GUI. However, there are some really ugly-assed Windows applications out there (mostly freeware and shareware) with no sense of good, usable GUI design at all.
The Mac OS X restrictions help reduce bad design. It's pretty rare that you find a freeware or shareware OS X application that looks like shit.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
What you need to know about cloud backup
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist