Facebook value drops $11.25bn
A pauper poking
Court papers have told the world what it already knows: Facebook is not worth $15bn.
That was the value Microsoft slapped on the social networking poster child last October when it forked over $240m for a 1.6 per cent stake in the company. But according to papers from the recently settled court case between Facebook and Harvard University dating site ConnectU, Facebook believes its common stock is worth only $3.75bn.
The founders of ConnectU have accused Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg of stealing their idea, and in February, the two companies reached a secret agreement involving cash and stock. But ConnectU later backed out of the deal, claiming it was unenforceable, and Facebook turned back to the courts.
According to case documents, ConnectU argued the deal was bogus in part because Facebook lied about its valuation when the Microsoft pact went through.
"The term sheet and settlement agreement is also unenforceable because it was procured by Facebook's fraud," the court papers say. "Indeed, based on a formal valuation resolution approved by Facebook's board of directors but concealed from ConnectU, the stock portion of the purported agreement is worth only one-quarter of its apparent value based on Facebook's public press releases."
In other words, ConnectU somehow nabbed Facebook's internal valuation of the company's common stock, and this figure was $3.75bn, not $15bn.
But as The New York Times points out, Microsoft bought preferred stock in Facebook. Preferred shares carry added shareholder rights, and that means they're worth more. So Microsoft has the figure too high. And ConnectU has it too low.
Or maybe they both have it too high. After all, no one really knows what a Facebook IPO would bring. But one thing's for sure: a 1.6 per stake isn't worth $240m. Even if you believe in social networking. Some described the Microsoft-Facebook tie-up using the word onanistic.
In any event, Judge James Ware has ordered ConnectU to honor its February Facebook settlement. ®
M$ never valued it at $15b
Why does every single commentator (not to mention journalist - shape up El Reg) miss out the one key point about the M$ - Facebook deal - that it was an advertising deal?
Since the value of the advertising component is never disclosed - they actually paid somewhere between $0 and $239,999,999 for 1.6% of Facebook, meaning there is no certainty whatsoever in the $15b valuation based on that number alone.
Most likely Microsoft a) values Facebook somewhere around $1b and b) sees any price as a shrewd way to keep Google's nasty mitts off it.
Stop banging the $15b valuation drum - it just isn't true!
Mark Zuckerberg looks just like Artie Ziff from the Simpsons - It's amazing!!
Re: "Drop the M$ non-cleverness...
Nope. Still not clever. Dumb.