Feeds

Ofcom swoops on caller ID-faking firm with... request for information

Your regulator: On top of the issues that matter

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Ofcom said today it has responded to the launch of a new service enabling scammers to spoof their caller ID by, erm, writing a letter to the firm responsible.

Yesterday we reported on how members of parliament have asked regulators to examine Spookcall, a new company that has brought the US practice of caller ID-spoofing to the UK. It's commonly used Stateside for identity theft, prank calling, fraud, voicemail hacking and by private investigators.

Reaction to the emergence of caller ID spoofing in the UK by the El Reg commentariat was negative, to say the least.

Our report of the MPs' call for action came after we told Ofcom about Spookcall on Monday. Today, following three days pursuit we were able to extract this comment from our communications regulator: "Ofcom is carefully examining Spook Call's [sic] service as detailed on their website and has contacted the company to gather further information about the nature of their service."

We can't tell you what's in the letter to Spookcall, because Ofcom says it's a hush-hush confidential mum's-the-word secret. We don't know when it hopes to form an opinion either. But it's promised to let us know when it does.

For its part, Spookcall says that its services are entirely legal in the UK.

While we wait for Ofcom to grind into gear, Spookcall will be offering anyone who can pay £5 for every 10 minutes call time the chance to replace their real dial-out number - which appears on the call recipient's display unless it's withheld - with any other digits.

Ofcom's had a while to ready itself for the launch of such a service in the UK. Caller ID-spoofing systems have been publicly available in the US since 2004, and legislation is currently under consideration in Congress to outlaw their abuse.

In fact, Ofcom told the BBC in 2005: "We are aware of it and are monitoring the issue." Yes, Ofcom has been monitoring the issue so closely that the first it apparently knew about Spookcall was when we rang on Monday.

We've contacted BT for a view on Spookcall, but it hasn't returned our call. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.