By RotaCyclicPosted Tuesday 10th June 2008 10:51 GMT
If corporate cheif execs are dense enough to open email attachments and run them then a) they can afford to lose the money and b) they deserve what they get.
By Frank GerlachPosted Tuesday 10th June 2008 11:58 GMT
Why don't run the (external) email program and the webbrowser in a separate VMWare image ? Deny the host machine contact with the internet. Doing everything on the same (logical) machine is clearly hazardous. I am waiting for html-mails that do a buffer overflow just by looking at them.
By Tim SchomerPosted Tuesday 10th June 2008 11:59 GMT
I agree with your sentiment, but in the real world, the execs never end up paying for their mistakes personally. It's usually some poor sod in finance (who's probably behind with the mortgage anyway) who'll end up carrying the can, or they use it as an excuse for cutting the IT budget yet again ("you should have stopped this!!!")
All the companies do then is up the prices of their products & services (usually about 5 times what they lost) so we all end up paying.
Paris, cos I don't reckon she'd ever get caught on this one...
By Anonymous CowardPosted Tuesday 10th June 2008 19:04 GMT
Whaling!?
Honestly. This has got to stop. Phishing, spear phishing, phone phishing/Vishing. Now whaling. I think the security lexicon has officially become over-fished.
Comments on: Whaling fraudsters harpoon 15,000 victims
Cream of the crop... #
By dervheid Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 09:38 GMT
Dense Execs #
By RotaCyclic Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 10:51 GMT
@Dense execs #
By Graham Bartlett Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 11:21 GMT
Internet-connected PCs are a hazard #
By Frank Gerlach Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 11:58 GMT
@ RotaCyclic #
By Tim Schomer Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 11:59 GMT
Whaling phraudsters harpoon 15,000 #
By Fatman Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 15:01 GMT
@dervheid #
By PunkTiger Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 17:35 GMT
Whaling #
By Anonymous Coward Posted Tuesday 10th June 2008 19:04 GMT