Feeds

Sun SOA launch sucks in open source

JavaCAPS 6.0 released

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

You remember SeeBeyond Technologies? Rather successful application integration company? Lots of really big customers and $140m in annual revenue? Purchased by Sun Microsystems in 2005 for the knockdown price of $387m.

Yes, well, Sun has released Java Composite Application Suite (CAPS) 6.0, an updated version of SeeBeyond's old Integrated Composite Application Network (ICAN) suite that takes the core foundation of that $387m investment and throws it to the wind, as open source code.

The core of version 6.0 is an open source Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), thanks to its use of Java Business Integration (JBI) in Sun's Open ESB project.

Also, Sun has announced a Master Data Management (MDN) suite based on Mural, a project announced at last month's JavaOne in San Francisco, California. MDM is designed to provide a single view of the customer in different applications. Mural is old SeeBeyond code; so far, it's unclear who, apart from Sun, is supporting it.

So if this is all open source code, what is Sun adding to the equation? According to Sun, JavaCAPS 6.0 still features some of the old closed-source 5.x code from ICAN, which was so valuable to customers in the past. Also, Sun's offering its support for Mural and OpenESB. Sun is charging for its time via subscription or you can pick a perpetual license.

This is a modular stack, and you can opt simply for the ESB, in which case subscriptions are $50 per employee per year and a perpetual license is $20,000 per socket.

Being open source, you can download the bits and bytes yourself. The benefit to customers of using Sun's implementation of Mural and OpenESB over other open source ESB products, though?

You get to use the rest of Sun's open source tools and middleware, namely the NetBeans IDE 6.1 and Glassfish 2.0 application server, according to director of service oriented architecture (SOA) and business integration Ashesh Badani told The Register.

Hmmm...

The disadvantage? Banking on software that's still new, and appears lacking in the usual rich ecosystem of templates, adaptors and plug-ins that are the hallmark of integration software.

Sun has 350 JavaCAPS partners, but was unable to give numbers on whose participating in Mural. Badarni hopes others will step forward and create additional components for MDM - such as customized templates and matching engines.®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9
Forget touchscreen millennials, Microsoft goes for mouse crowd
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
Lotus Notes inventor Ozzie invents app to talk to people on your phone
Imagine that. Startup floats with voice collab app for Win iPhone
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.