SpaceShipOne firm to build Stealth Bomber 4.0?
Even its raison d'être can't be detected
What you need to know about cloud backup
Media reports suggest that the US military has begun a secret, multibillion-dollar programme which will develop a new and more effective Stealth bomber. Reports indicate that Scaled Composites - famous for its X-Prize and Virgin Galactic rocketplane work - will play a key role.
Evidence suggesting the existence of the new secret aircraft programme has been compiled by Bill Sweetman, doyen of aerospace journalists and the secret-plane spotter's secret plane spotter. He is nowadays editor of Defence Technology International - part of the Aviation Week media stable.
Sweetman has been poking around the idea of a new, "black" (that is, secret) bomber for a while now, noting that the US Air Force has been boldly assuming it would have a "Next Generation Bomber" or "Long Range Strike" plane of some kind by 2018 - despite the fact that there is no generally-known, published project or budget in existence which could produce any such thing. Normally there ought to be a well-funded development effort underway by now, given such a timeline.
A further clue, Sweetman believes, is offered by the US Air Force's withdrawal from the Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS), in which the USAF and US Navy jointly sought to build a fighter-sized, stealthy robot aircraft able to fly combat missions. The Navy has proceeded openly with its UCAS-D demonstrator project, in which Northrop Grumman's X-47B roboplane is expected to become the world's first robot carrier aircraft. (Well, the first big one, anyway.)
Sweetman reckons the US air force's next-gen aircraft push hasn't just stalled or vanished, as it seemed was the case with the USAF pullout from UCAS. That money and effort, he believes, has simply gone black, disappeared from view and carried on working. Freed from the limits of carrier aviation, the aircraft can thus become strategic bomber sized like the existing B-1, B-2 and B-52.
But it's fairly hard to make money disappear - it has a way of popping up again somewhere else. In this case, Sweetman reckons he's found the missing Air Force billions - in Northrop Grumman's accounts. The company says it has $2bn in new "restricted programs" business during Q1 at its aircraft-making division, which certainly seems to point to a major contract award.
Another hint may be taken from Northrop's purchase last year of Scaled Composites, the famous company which won the Ansari X-Prize with its SpaceShipOne rocketplane. Scaled is now building a fleet of suborbital tourist planes for Richard Branson's "Virgin Galactic" spaceline. The firm has also done a lot of work on innovative aircraft tech for the Pentagon in the past, and could well be expected to play a big role in the future black bomber and Navy robo-plane efforts.
Sweetman reckons the secret bomber will be stealthy - of course! - and supersonic, but probably not hypersonic as nobody is confident of making a Mach-4+ plane in the next decade. (Except those wacky pranksters at DARPA, but they'll say anything. Anyway, doing both stealth and hypersonic at once would seem to be asking too much altogether.)
Of course, the existing B-1 is already supersonic and the B-2 is stealthy; the F-22 Raptor and upcoming F-35 Lightning are both, though smaller and shorter ranged. However, the B-2 has horrendous maintenance and handling issues. Furthermore, like all early-generation Stealth planes, it's a lot less stealthy from some directions than others. This can make planning a mission very complicated, as the bomber has to avoid pointing any of its less-stealthy bits at air defence radar stations during its trip. (Or else be far away, or have a jammer aircraft backing it up or something.)
COMMENTS
If something blows up for no apparent reason, blame the USAF
I look forward to the day when schools can buy all the books they need and the airforce has to hold a bake sale to buy a new bomber.
F22 (FR/L)ightning II
In the good old days, aircraft manufacturers would build an 'extra' airframe or two and suspend them with lots of wires attached; they would then pull all the bits hither and yon and see if they could break anything. These were called "Iron Bird" test rigs.
These days, almost everything is designed on computer and tested in a wind tunnel to prove the aerodynamics, then built - all these new-fangled special materials (ie carbon fibre, other non-metallic composites, etc) are just too gorram expensive to waste on such trivialities as a test article to pull apart.
Shortly after the F15s started falling out of the sky a few months back, it was discovered that the F22's fuselage wasn't quite as strong as they'd thought and the things started bending a bit, just behind where the soft pink squidgy thing sits...
Typical military SNAFU, but what should they expect when they get it from the cheapest bidder... unless they *have* seen the error of their ways and gone back to NG for some (Y)F23s to, ahem, "supplement" the Raptors...
Mine's the one with the "Go, Black Widow!", "Harrier (Ground) Crew do it both ways!" and "I was a Pilot before Pontius" patches.
Hustler II too small to launch canceled Advanced Cruise Missile
The FB-22 should be called the Hustler II because it would be The Force's second delta wing supersonic medium range bomber.
As for stealthy cruise missiles, they've been canceled, or so they want us to think.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-129_ACM#External_links
In March 2007, despite a Service Life Extension program (SLEP) intended to extend its operational usefulness to 2030, the USAF announced that it will retire its entire inventory of AGM-129 missiles.

What you need to know about cloud backup
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software
SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had