The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Split on support for 'old' Java in next Eclipse

Old Java 

Posted Wednesday 28th May 2008 18:20 GMT

Considering that there are embedded platforms which only support JDK 1.3 still, arguing about dropping 1.4 support seems a bit optimistic.

seen it all before 

Posted Wednesday 28th May 2008 19:40 GMT

Coat

Pascal all over agan, and look where Pascal is these days...

Mine's the one with the Fortran IV book in tghe pocket.

where is Pascal these days... 

Posted Wednesday 28th May 2008 20:54 GMT

UCSD Pascal's concept of write once run anywhere interpreted Pcode sounds a lot (to me) like the Java concept of write once debug everywhere Java bytecode.

But then I'm a dinosaur.

There's not much worth doing that can't be done in PDP11 Fortran IV. The overlays can get a bit tricky sometimes, given that there's only 64kB to play with, but...

Drop 1.4? Are they crazy? 

Posted Wednesday 28th May 2008 22:13 GMT

Taking that there are loads of app servers running J2EE 1.4, I doubt it to be a good idea dropping 1.4 at all.

Java 5 dropping Entity Beans was reason enough *not* to embrace the Java EE 5 thingy. It isn't nice to set up a standard, and then changing everything in the next release, leaving those who actually adopted it in the cold.

Kind of like those SOAP rpc/encoded webservices...

Why Netbeans is winning friends 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 00:39 GMT

Go

Because we're all sick and tired of being messed about by IBM and friends.

PDP-11 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 07:46 GMT

Thumb Up

"There's not much worth doing that can't be done in PDP11 Fortran IV. "

You are standing at the end of a road before a small brick building

"The overlays can get a bit tricky sometimes, given that there's only 64kB to play with, but..."

128k if you have an I/D space machine... Now if only I could get some bootable RSX-11M media for mine :(

Performance 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 09:00 GMT

Thumb Up

Performance is indisputably better in the newer versions of java, particularly 6, so any argument for staying with 1.4 based on performance is doomed to look stupid.

Entity beans weren't dropped, the interface and implementation was cleaned up/fixed.

http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/31488/1954

Here's an article on migrating forwards from EJB 2.1 to EJB 3.0

My little contribution ... 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 09:04 GMT

Well, at least I got the dependency of 'get time and date' on AWT removed from 1.4 ...

Forward! 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 09:43 GMT

There is no good reason to support ancient Java versions in a new Eclipse version - those who need support for an old version can obviously run an old version of Eclipse. It is not like those poor sods who use Visual Studio and discover that it is impossible to buy the old version they have to use for their legacy code.

1.4? That would be nice. 

Posted Thursday 29th May 2008 18:07 GMT

We develop an API and still have a number of clients still running Java 1.3 - and last month got an email from a corporate client who was still running 1.2! This is J2SE as well.

Java 1.3 ... Java 6 

Posted Friday 30th May 2008 10:34 GMT

Write once, run anywhen ?

Don’t Miss

SunSun's surviving staff hit with 'motivation' missive

Exclusive Code: Your solace, our savior

Ubuntu teaser Ubuntu's Karmic Koala bares fangs at Windows 7

Review Shuttleworthian scrap

AppleChange your views: OS X tags exploited

Mac Secrets Apple windows insider

JavaSun preps cell-phone Java plan for netbooks

OpenWorld 09 Modules not globules