Comms:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘AT&T giveth free Jesus Phone WiFi’And AT&T taketh awayPublished Monday 5th May 2008 18:11 GMT
Mouse TrapBy TranceMist
Posted Monday 5th May 2008 20:53 GMT
The goal of man is to build a better mouse trap. The goal of nature is to build better mice. Man in the middleBy Sampler
Posted Monday 5th May 2008 21:52 GMT
So not someone spoofing the Starbucks wifi and gathering a great deal of dumb people numbers to sell to a telemarketer? I'd wager a list of people dumb enough to buy an iPhone and pay that much for brown and water would be worth a bit as they'd be pretty much anyones "target audience" :D but where's theBy tim
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 00:28 GMT
angle? >>snerk<< well, there you have it. starbucks+ianything is pretty much a targeted demographic. hey... remember copla years ago when some turkish sheep fell off a cliff and some godawfully huge number of other sheep followed them [ reported in el reg, natch]? yep. it's like that. Costs?By Christian Berger
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 06:15 GMT
Doesn't it cost more to restrict access to certain users then simply to give everybody free access. I mean a hotspot doesn't generate more costs when it's in use, still you should pay for it. On the other side, toilets costs substancial costs when in use, yet in many places they are freely usable. Lovely...By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 08:54 GMT
Good to see the self-righteous sneering is in full swing already. Do they have anything similar to the 1990 Computer Misuse Act over there? WellBy heystoopid
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 10:05 GMT
Peter Principle adherent : Well , it seemed liked a good idea at the time ! @Christian BergerBy Graham Wood
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 10:09 GMT
Can't comment on that side of the pond, but here there's a lot of charging based on data flow - so more people using it does cost you more. Also, if you make it free, you'll get a lot more people using it - making the connection a lot slower for your paying customers... However, I'd agree with you that the costs associated with locking it down probably do exceed the revenue... Especially since there are so many ways to get around it if you know what you're doing. Not worth itBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 11:45 GMT
If you have to use Safari... Even having to spoof the User-Agent is bad enough.... Anon due to flamebait WARNING! Logic free zone!By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 6th May 2008 12:52 GMT
@Christian Berger 'Also, if you make it free, you'll get a lot more people using it - making the connection a lot slower for your paying customers...' Shall we examine that assertion with logic enabled? 'Also, if you MAKE IT FREE, you'll get a lot more people using it - making the connection a lot slower for YOUR PAYING CUSTOMERS...' WHAT paying customers? You just made it FREE! If it's FREE, by definition there are NO paying customers - there may have been, once upon a time, but YOU just made it FREE! Remember? Hah! You throw user manuals together for a living, don't you? :-) The period for commenting on this story has finished |
Delivering wirefree enterprise mobility & services. Meet 100+ suppliers. Attend Free seminars.
21st–22nd May |
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search