Feeds

Indian electronics firm has Moto device biz in its sights

Videocon fancies a bit

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Indian consumer electronics supplier Videocon has been on the blower to Motorola with a view to taking control of the mobe co's devices division for an undisclosed price.

The news comes from Business Week, which quotes Videocon chairman Venugopal Dhoot as being serious about the bid, despite the objections of analysts and Motorola's insistence that the devices division is not for sale.

Videocon supplies and manufacturers consumer electronics from more than a dozen factories in India, and boasts facilities in China, Mexico and Japan to name just three. Its enormous ambition extends to interests in oil and gas production.

That ambition snagged it a mobile phone licence in India last year, and the company is planning to launch a network in the next few months despite considerable competition in the Indian market. So snaring Motorola could be seen as a synergistic fit.

The company's majestic motto is "India today, the world tomorrow". It surprised everyone in 2005 by buying up Thomson's picture-tube business, and the local subsidiary of Electrolux in 2006 - so there is some precedent, even if it's nothing on the scale of Motorola.

A more important problem could well be the cultural differences between the two companies. Videocon is a typical Indian company, made up of various cross-holdings and a web of registered entities. Integrating with Motorola's American-style infrastructure would require significant work, and pain, on both sides - though one can assume that most of the pain would be on the Motorola side.

We've not been able to contact Videocon for comment, but it certainly has enough cash; and with 120 million handsets sold in India during 2007, its local expertise could turn out to be more important than compatible management styles.

There is still the nagging matter of Motorola denying the handset business is up for sale. It wants to see the division spun off into a stand-alone company, but stand-alone phone manufacturers are few and far between. The very fact that Dhoot is willing to make an offer like this is indicative of the state Motorola has got itself into. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Download alert: Nearly ALL top 100 Android, iOS paid apps hacked
Attack of the Clones? Yeah, but much, much scarier – report
Broadband sellers in the UK are UP TO no good, says Which?
Speedy network claims only apply to 10% of customers
Virgin Media struck dumb by NATIONWIDE packet loss balls-up
Turning it off and on again fixes glitch 12 HOURS LATER
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Facebook, working on Facebook at Work, works on Facebook. At Work
You don't want your cat or drunk pics at the office
Soz, web devs: Google snatches its Wallet off the table
Killing off web service in 3 months... but app-happy bonkers are fine
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.