Science:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘DARPA wants microscopic atom clocks on chips’To put inside brainchip zombie cyborg moths, of coursePublished Friday 25th April 2008 13:32 GMT
Metrology is..By Mark_T
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 14:15 GMT
The science of taking measurements. We engineers do lots of it. Metrology Equipment covers everything from a plastic rule to an electron microscope. I'm sure DARPA is thinking of difficult projects just to justify themselves and their funding. Might acutally work!By Kenneth Chan
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 14:18 GMT
And useful as well. Now where is my robot butler? ...where dreams come true.By Nate
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 14:48 GMT
"Assuming that you dream of hypersonic spaceplanes, portable rayguns, mighty globe-roaming Z-wing stratocruisers, invincible semi-intelligent battle computers and things of that sort, anyway." Who _doesn't_ dream of that stuff? Plans for global dominationBy Alistair
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 15:05 GMT
Were thwarted by the headlights of an oncoming car. Why no bugsplat icon?? PC clocksBy Rich
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 15:06 GMT
I'd be happy with a PC clock that is more accurate than the usual +/-3 minutes/day!! Why ARE PC clocks still so bloody inaccurate? Stern GerlachBy Alex
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 15:24 GMT
You've made one physicist laugh today :) miniaturised Stern-Gerlach apparatus indeed! Mines the one with the Z-pinch in the pocket PC clocks are inaccurate to save moneyBy Flocke Kroes
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 16:30 GMT
Quartz crystals are good at doing about 1 to 40MHz. PC clocks go at 32KHz to reduce power and hence the cost of the backup battery. The frequency of quartz crystals varies with temperature, some more than others. You get what you pay for. The crystal circuit also includes the PCB, a few capacitors an a chip. Variations in these components add a small error to frequency. Many years ago, that was fixed by adding a small variable capacitor, but that costs some money to add, and more to set correctly. If you want you PC to know the right time, use some network time protocol software. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntpd Still looking for a clock that reads either: "Yes, there is time." or "No, there isn't." Chip-Scale Atomic Clock is a farceBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 17:39 GMT
The first thing to say is how misleading the hype is on size & accuracy of Chip-Scale Atomic Clocks. The players in this field always photograph the unpackaged devices because they look small. But to thermally stabilize them, the vacuum packaging they require is pretty large. Second, there are tricks with thermally stabilized multi-mode quartz oscillators & contactless packaging that get you "atomic clock" accuracy in that technology for a fraction of the cost, power consumption & size. insect controlBy Jason Harvey
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 18:35 GMT
always makes me think of the movie "The Fifth Element" mines the one with the joystick and headset in the pockets Nano-clock uses?By Daniel B.
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 19:12 GMT
Hm... that might be of good use when kidnapped, as you now can keep track of time, or get a nice "in eye" nano display showing date and time, a la Neuromancer. Mine's the one made out of nanobots. Ha haBy Chris G
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 19:17 GMT
It's easy to laugh at the boffins of DARPA but have you ever wondered at the sometimes irrational things the British government do? Roswell controlled cyborgs the lot of them! Brings a new meaning to having had ones' chips. @ Chip-Scale Atomic Clock is a farceBy Kenneth Chan
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 20:27 GMT
DARPA is looking for a primary frequency standard in a 5cc volume, so yea, they are looking for an atomic clock. Unless you can calculate from first principles the vibration frequency of a hunk of quartz. 5ccs?!By Mike
Posted Friday 25th April 2008 20:54 GMT
"DARPA is looking for a primary frequency standard in a 5cc volume" Imagines the size of moth needed to discreetly hide such a device... Holy $^&^%*(! "in-bonce satnav"By ImaGnuber
Posted Saturday 26th April 2008 02:14 GMT
"an ultraminiaturised in-bonce satnav" Now why can't DARPA talk like that? Or politicians? I'd vote for anyone who said "an ultraminiaturised in-bonce satnav". Re above ref to Fifth Element... Ah Mila, Mila, Mila... The period for commenting on this story has finished |
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search